Re: [Slashcode-general] Jumping in here late ... Slashcode is Dead ...

[Andre-John M. <aj...@sy...>]

On 21-Sep-2009, at 14:00, Chris Nandor wrote:

> On Sep 21, 2009, at 10:48, W. Scott Lockwood III wrote:
>
>> The fact that almost _no one_ uses it in production anymore is kind
>> of a
>> clue...
>
> Even if true that almost no one uses it, a clue leads to something.
> What is your clue leading to?  A flaw in Apache 1.x we should be aware
> of?
>
>
>> at some point you guys will likely end up having to upgrade, right?
>
> Can you give me a reason why we would?  No person has ever given me a
> serious reason why we should use Apache 2, other than what you did:
> everyone else does it.  It would take significant resources, for no
> significant benefit, so we haven't bothered.

The one I would provide is IPv6 support, but then again I am on
the IPv6 bandwagon ;) Then again given that libwww maintainers aren't
even looking in that direction, Slashcode would have this to resolve
first.

André