From: Shane Z. <sh...@lo...> - 2009-09-21 20:10:11
|
On Sep 21, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > great to see that not all people lost hope. :-) > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:56:43PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> My prior desire is to modernize the technology ... newer perl, newer >> apache, newer mysql, improved postgresql support ... to me, those >> are the >> easy parts though ... > > There is a patch from 2004 at > http://www.crackerjack.net/slash-2.2.6-modperl2.diff.txt against the > last > stable release 2.2.6. > > Another thing Slashcode needs (at least WRT the public) is a release > management. Proper stable releases and changelogs. This will help > people who package software for distributions a lot. We did come up with a system for automated updates. We used it on our slash-hosting environment for years; We even upgraded a number of clients from the pre (2.2.6) to cvs-HEAD (at the time) using the tools. A few years ago I think I did package them up and sent them (or bits and pieces) to someone from the OSTG Slashcode crew for perusal. I don't honestly recall what ever happened with it; I'm fairly certain some of the patches I wrote/wanted/submitted to the Slash::Install module made it into the public tree. Some didn't. (An example was recursive slash.conf calls, I think it turned out modding the installer was a bit more of a task to make it work then what I had time to contribute towards that). The update system's code, while functional, was just never finished "aka cleaned up and releasable" by me. It "worked for us" (in about 2 minutes time we were able to update an entire slash-farm on a weekly basis) and that was enough, and we had to move on towards other money making ventures. I have "finish, clean and put up on github" on my todo list for it, when there's this thing called "Freetime" that I'm not finding too often. Maybe someday. Shane |