Re: [Slashcode-general] Jumping in here late ... Slashcode is Dead ...

[Chris N. <pu...@sl...>]

We are open to input, but our schedules our tight.  We can't just  
accept anything.  And as noted in another post, it's not just running  
Apache2 code that works, it's configuring and managing Apache2  
servers, which is not an insignificant tax on our resources.


On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:48, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:

> So it's really, "Why should Slashdot (since that's who is putting  
> resources into it) do this work for nothing?"  That leads to the  
> question, how open are slash developers "on the inside" to input  
> "from the outside"?  If someone were to do the heavy lifting, would  
> it be accepted?  Would /. conceivably switch over to the new version  
> and run Apache2?


-- 
Chris Nandor             pu...@po...             http://pudge.net/
Slashdot / SourceForge   pu...@sl...       http://slashdot.org/