Re: [Slashcode-general] Jumping in here late ... Slashcode is Dead ...

[Marc G. F. <sc...@hu...>]

On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Chris Nandor wrote:

> On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:26, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
>
>> I think it comes down to "why deploy two servers if you can do
>> one?"  Most people these days, if they're going Apache, are going
>> Apache2.  Apache isn't exactly lightweight.  So deploying a second
>> heavy server just to run slash seems overkill for something that
>> ought to be much more straightforward.  That's my take on it.
>
> I hear you, but that is not a problem for Slashdot, of course.  So the
> question for *us* -- considering resources we'd have to devote to make
> a change -- is of what's inherently better about Apache2 that would
> justify the change for us.

One thing to note along this thread ... is Apache 1.x even considered 
"dead" yet?  When did 1.3.41 come out?  Wasn't it just recently?

----
Marc G. Fournier                        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
sc...@hu...                                     http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy    Skype: hub.org    ICQ:7615664    MSN:sc...@hu...