Re: [Slashcode-general] Jumping in here late ... Slashcode is Dead ...

[Chris N. <pu...@sl...>]

On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:26, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:

> I think it comes down to "why deploy two servers if you can do  
> one?"  Most people these days, if they're going Apache, are going  
> Apache2.  Apache isn't exactly lightweight.  So deploying a second  
> heavy server just to run slash seems overkill for something that  
> ought to be much more straightforward.  That's my take on it.

I hear you, but that is not a problem for Slashdot, of course.  So the  
question for *us* -- considering resources we'd have to devote to make  
a change -- is of what's inherently better about Apache2 that would  
justify the change for us.

-- 
Chris Nandor             pu...@po...             http://pudge.net/
Slashdot / SourceForge   pu...@sl...       http://slashdot.org/