Re: [Slashcode-development] ACLs for slashcode

[Chris N. <pu...@po...>]

At 07:26 +0100 2001.03.13, Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
>Chris Nandor wrote:
>>
>> Actually, users_param just uses a text field for "value" now.  So the only
>> issue would be picking a better limit for "name".
>
>
>Ops, in 1.1.5 ...

Yep, it was changed back to varchar, and then back to text.

>
>mysql> desc users_param;
>+----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
>| Field    | Type         | Null | Key | Default | Extra          |
>+----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
>| param_id | int(11)      |      | PRI | 0       | auto_increment |
>| uid      | int(11)      |      | MUL | 1       |                |
>| name     | varchar(32)  |      |     |         |                |
>| value    | varchar(254) |      |     |         |                |
>+----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
>
>If the value is a text field it is perfect :-)

Yeah, however, as I noted as a possibility, and Brian echoed, I think it is
best if users_acl is a separate table, just to keep it cleaner.  Just take
the users_param schema from CVS (or this one, changing value to a text
field), and duplicate exactly for a users_acl table.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      pu...@po...    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    pu...@os...     http://osdn.com/