From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-02-23 17:02:29
|
A lot of people have been talking about calendering in the past. Well, my concern is that it does everything a calendar "should" do. To wit: there is a Perl project being planned called Reefknot (http://sourceforge.net/projects/reefknot/) that looks very promising. The two people running it are very dependable, so I have little doubt the project will be developed and will work well. They have some info at the SourceForge site above. Now, a Calendaring plugin for Slash does not need to use Reefknot (though I am quite lazy and would rather use another good project than develop our own), but the interesting thing I did not prevoiously know about is that there is an RFC for calendaring. See RFCs 2445 - 2447. They were written by folks from Microsoft and Lotus. I don't know much about it, but it seems like it would certainly be a very good idea to investigate, before moving forward, whether a Calendar plugin for Slash should be RFC 2445 compliant (2446 and 2447 describe message and transport protocols). And if RFC 2445 is a good way to go for a Slash plugin, then should Reefknot be the implementation used? I don't have answers, but thought that this would be useful information. -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |