From: Dave A. <dav...@ct...> - 2000-12-04 16:20:50
|
> OK, here is a list of the data for stories that we have available, > that we might want to put in to RSS 1.0 files. I listed pretty much > all the data for stories, and just a few things for site. Comments > welcome. > > The purpose of this is to put these items into available RSS fields, > either in the RSS core in Dublin Core, or in our own Slash XML module. > > From here, we could then move on to defining fields for comments > and users, and any other data we want to search on, for the purpose > of returning search data to users and to any other searches we want > to enable. > CTDATA supports RSS 0.91 on all of its Slash 0.3-based sites. In our RSS file creation process we map introtext to description. The description field is used by a number of RSS aggregation sites, including my.userland.com and xmltree.com. Is there any reason why this same approach would not be advisable under RSS 1.0, apart from the fact that some people in the RSS 1.0 working group have tried to "route around" RSS 0.91, apparently for political reasons? Dave Aiello CTDATA |