Menu
▾
▴
sisuite-announce
|
From: Andrea R. <a....@ci...> - 2008-02-16 15:27:40
|
Hi all, I'd like to point to our new Google Maps like tool to keep track who's using SystemImager around the world: http://wiki.systemimager.org/cluster-register/cluster-map.php We're really interested in this kind of feedback and user experiences in general, so if you're using SystemImager in your organization, company, laboratory, school, etc., please, consider to register your cluster on the map. A big thank to Bernard that provided the cluster map code used for OSCAR (http://oscar.openclustergroup.org/cluster-map). There are some small changes respect to the OSCAR version in order to make it more suitable for SystemImager. And a big thank in advance to all the users that'll register their clusters on the map! -Andrea PS suggestions/bugs reporting about the cluster map interface are welcome as well. |
|
From: Bas v. d. V. <ba...@sa...> - 2008-02-16 17:43:29
|
On Feb 16, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Andrea Righi wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to point to our new Google Maps like tool to keep track who's > using SystemImager around the world: > > http://wiki.systemimager.org/cluster-register/cluster-map.php > > We're really interested in this kind of feedback and user > experiences in > general, so if you're using SystemImager in your organization, > company, > laboratory, school, etc., please, consider to register your cluster on > the map. > > A big thank to Bernard that provided the cluster map code used for > OSCAR > (http://oscar.openclustergroup.org/cluster-map). There are some small > changes respect to the OSCAR version in order to make it more suitable > for SystemImager. > > And a big thank in advance to all the users that'll register their > clusters on the map! > > -Andrea > > PS suggestions/bugs reporting about the cluster map interface are > welcome as well. It is a nice feature to have the cluster map. I have a remark the interface expects one type of node for the whole cluster. At our site we have different nodes in the same cluster: - 1850 with 2 cpu's - 1950 with 2 quad cores To make it more complicated the memory is also different in the nodes ;-) -- Bas van der Vlies ba...@sa... |
|
From: Andrea R. <a....@ci...> - 2008-02-16 19:31:55
|
Bas van der Vlies wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Andrea Righi wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to point to our new Google Maps like tool to keep track who's >> using SystemImager around the world: >> >> http://wiki.systemimager.org/cluster-register/cluster-map.php >> >> We're really interested in this kind of feedback and user >> experiences in >> general, so if you're using SystemImager in your organization, >> company, >> laboratory, school, etc., please, consider to register your cluster on >> the map. >> >> A big thank to Bernard that provided the cluster map code used for >> OSCAR >> (http://oscar.openclustergroup.org/cluster-map). There are some small >> changes respect to the OSCAR version in order to make it more suitable >> for SystemImager. >> >> And a big thank in advance to all the users that'll register their >> clusters on the map! >> >> -Andrea >> >> PS suggestions/bugs reporting about the cluster map interface are >> welcome as well. > > > > It is a nice feature to have the cluster map. I have a remark the > interface expects one type of node for the whole cluster. At our site > we have different nodes in the same cluster: > - 1850 with 2 cpu's > - 1950 with 2 quad cores > > To make it more complicated the memory is also different in the > nodes ;-) yup! heterogeneous clusters :-P, yes, probably we could change the interface using a multi-value attribute for CPU-type (and also for memory), but I wouldn't like to complicate too much the interface or maybe users will be discouraged. For now I've relaxed the Rmax < Rpeak constraint, otherwise you cannot register the Rmax value when you use a custom label for CPU type (and IMHO your "CPU_type_1 and CPU_type_2" syntax it's simple and express very well the concept). Thanks Bas! -Andrea |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X