From: <da...@da...> - 2002-06-25 18:39:11
|
this would be rather difficult, sense the sf machines don't have the proper build-dependencies. we could have a cron job that just mirrors the bits from another machine, or just links directly to another machine. On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:23:06PM -0500, Brian Finley wrote: > I like this idea, Dann. What does it take for you to get this up and > running in http://systemimager.org/manual/html/ ? > > -Brian > > > > On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 23:20, dann frazier wrote: > > hey, > > i've implemented a system to autobuild the manual upon commit. > > i'd like to suggest that we have at least 2 manuals online at any > > given time - one for the top of the stable branch, and one for the > > top of branch for the next stable series. the manual is a more > > fluid document then the code of a release, and it's content is > > often driven by issues that occur after release. > > > > This can allow changes to the manual to be immediately viewable by > > users, and will hopefully reduce a number of FAQs. > > > > Right now, I'm just auto-updating html & pdfs for the manual in the > > unstable-2_1_x branch. > > > > http://home.dannf.org/~dannf/si-doc-autobuild/manual_source/html/ > > http://home.dannf.org/~dannf/si-doc-autobuild/manual_source/systemimager-manual.pdf > > -- da...@da... |