sipp-users

[Sipp-users] Regular Expression Issue

[Sumeet B. <sum...@pe...>]

Hi all,

I am using SIPp3.1.

I am using more than one regular expression for header validation. When any
1st regular expression gets failed, SIPp logs message in error.log. But it
doesn't log the message for all the failed regular expression.

I want SIPp to log all failed regular expression in the error.log.

For example :

Suppose we have 3 regular expression as below.

1. <ereg regexp=".7777701854.*" search_in="hdr" header="From:"
check_it="true" assign_to="4" />
2. <ereg regexp=".7777701854.*" search_in="hdr" header="Contact:"
check_it="true" assign_to="9"/>
3. <ereg regexp=".INVITE.*" search_in="msg" check_it="true" assign_to="12"/>

If 1st and 2nd regular expression gest failed then SIPp logs only 1st one
and if 1st one passes and 2nd and 3rd gets failed then it logs only 2nd not
3rd one.

Does anyone know how to solve this problem?


Please help to resolve this issue.

Thanks and Regards
-Sumeet

 

 

 

[Sipp-users] Regular Expression Issue

[Sumeet B. <sum...@pe...>]

Hi all,

I am using SIPp3.1.

I am using more than one regular expression for header validation. When any
1st regular expression gets failed, SIPp logs message in error.log. But it
doesn't log the message for all the failed regular expression.

I want SIPp to log all failed regular expression in the error.log.

For example :

Suppose we have 3 regular expression as below.

1. <ereg regexp=".7777701854.*" search_in="hdr" header="From:"
check_it="true" assign_to="4" />
2. <ereg regexp=".7777701854.*" search_in="hdr" header="Contact:"
check_it="true" assign_to="9"/>
3. <ereg regexp=".INVITE.*" search_in="msg" check_it="true" assign_to="12"/>

If 1st and 2nd regular expression gest failed then SIPp logs only 1st one
and if 1st one passes and 2nd and 3rd gets failed then it logs only 2nd not
3rd one.

Does anyone know how to solve this problem?


Please help to resolve this issue.

Thanks and Regards
-Sumeet

 

 

 

[Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

[Venkat N. <dra...@ya...>]

Hi,

I am having the following issue ... i know it looks wierd(bold text) but i dont know why ...

any help appreciated. thanks in advance

2008-11-24 18:41:45: Aborting call on unexpected message for Call-ID '8e31788c00
8d57502231312@2385606796': while expecting '202' response, received 'SIP/2.0 202
 Accepted
CSeq: 2 REFER
From: DEVIS_CEL <sip:+393492222222@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1
To: Susan <sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1
Call-ID: 8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796
Contact: "Susan"<sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158:5065>
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.232.35.158:5065;branch=z9hG4bK11111
Content-Length: 0



      

Re: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

[Peter H. <pl...@ho...>]

The only time I have seen this was due to the CSeq checking. I ended up disabling it in my local version but the mainline has been through a few revisons since I last looked at this area. So look at what you sent compared with the CSeq you received.
Peter



Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:14:40 +0000From: dra...@ya...: sip...@li...: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem


Hi,I am having the following issue ... i know it looks wierd(bold text) but i dont know why ...any help appreciated. thanks in advance2008-11-24 18:41:45: Aborting call on unexpected message for Call-ID '8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796': while expecting '202' response, received 'SIP/2.0 202 AcceptedCSeq: 2 REFERFrom: DEVIS_CEL <sip:+393492222222@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1To: Susan <sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1Call-ID: 8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796Contact: "Susan"<sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158:5065>Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.232.35.158:5065;branch=z9hG4bK11111Content-Length: 0
_________________________________________________________________
BigSnapSearch.com - 24 prizes a day, every day - Search Now!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/117442309/direct/01/

Re: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

[Dhananjaya R. E. <ed...@gm...>]

I usually see these type of errors if call-id's differs.

Dhana

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Venkat Narasimhan
<dra...@ya...>wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> I am having the following issue ... i know it looks wierd(bold text) but i
> dont know why ...
>
> any help appreciated. thanks in advance
>
> 2008-11-24 18:41:45: Aborting call on unexpected message for Call-ID
> '8e31788c00
> 8d57502231312@2385606796': while expecting '202' response, received
> 'SIP/2.0 202
>  Accepted
> CSeq: 2 REFER
> From: DEVIS_CEL <sip:+393492222222@10.232.35.158<sip%3A%2B393492222222@10.232.35.158>
> >;tag=MS1a1
> To: Susan <sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158<sip%3A%2B393331234567@10.232.35.158>
> >;tag=MS1a1
> Call-ID: 8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796
> Contact: "Susan"<sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158:5065>
> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.232.35.158:5065;branch=z9hG4bK11111
> Content-Length: 0
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Sipp-users mailing list
> Sip...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>
>

Re: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

[Venkat N. <dra...@ya...>]

Thanks for the reply

The CSeq is same for both the request and the response. Another thing about this scenario is that
I send REFER in one script and recieve 202 in another script ... by consecutively running two instances of SIPp ..




________________________________
From: Peter Higginson <pl...@ho...>
To: dra...@ya...; sipp_users <sip...@li...>
Sent: Monday, 24 November, 2008 21:48:40
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

 The only time I have seen this was due to the CSeq checking. I ended up disabling it in my local version but the mainline has been through a few revisons since I last looked at this area. So look at what you sent compared with the CSeq you received.

Peter

________________________________
 
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:14:40 +0000
From: dra...@ya...
To: sip...@li...
Subject: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem


 
Hi,

I am having the following issue ... i know it looks wierd(bold text) but i dont know why ...

any help appreciated. thanks in advance

2008-11-24 18:41:45: Aborting call on unexpected message for Call-ID '8e31788c00
8d57502231312@2385606796': while expecting '202' response, received 'SIP/2.0 202
 Accepted
CSeq: 2 REFER
From: DEVIS_CEL <sip:+393492222222@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1
To: Susan <sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1
Call-ID: 8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796
Contact: "Susan"<sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158:5065>
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.232.35.158:5065;branch=z9hG4bK11111
Content-Length: 0


________________________________
Click here for FREE customisable desktop wallpapers. Get them Now!


      

Re: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

[Peter H. <pl...@ho...>]

 
If you are running two instances, the second has no way to know what CSeq/method the first instance sent. So the problem is most likely the CSeq logic.
Peter



Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:25:49 +0000From: dra...@ya...: Re: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problemTo: pl...@ho...; sip...@li...



Thanks for the replyThe CSeq is same for both the request and the response. Another thing about this scenario is thatI send REFER in one script and recieve 202 in another script ... by consecutively running two instances of SIPp ..



From: Peter Higginson <pl...@ho...>To: dra...@ya...; sipp_users <sip...@li...>Sent: Monday, 24 November, 2008 21:48:40Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

The only time I have seen this was due to the CSeq checking. I ended up disabling it in my local version but the mainline has been through a few revisons since I last looked at this area. So look at what you sent compared with the CSeq you received.Peter

Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:14:40 +0000From: dra...@ya...: sip...@li...: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem


Hi,I am having the following issue ... i know it looks wierd(bold text) but i dont know why ...any help appreciated. thanks in advance2008-11-24 18:41:45: Aborting call on unexpected message for Call-ID '8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796': while expecting '202' response, received 'SIP/2.0 202 AcceptedCSeq: 2 REFERFrom: DEVIS_CEL <sip:+393492222222@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1To: Susan <sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1Call-ID: 8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796Contact: "Susan"<sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158:5065>Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.232.35.158:5065;branch=z9hG4bK11111Content-Length: 0

Click here for FREE customisable desktop wallpapers. Get them Now!
_________________________________________________________________
Win £1000 John Lewis shopping sprees with BigSnapSearch.com
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/117442309/direct/01/

Re: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

[Venkat N. <dra...@ya...>]

Thanks again.

I see your point. In those scripts, the REFER has different call ID(out-of-dialog) compared to the previous messages ... so what options do i have ...

1. either i can ignore 202 and put a pause in script1 so that even if the out-of-dialog 202 comes, SIPp will not fail at the <pause> element and just log the 202 as "unexpected"

2. or i have to figure out how to handle the out-of-dialog 202 



________________________________
From: Peter Higginson <pl...@ho...>
To: dra...@ya...; sipp_users <sip...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2008 22:38:52
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

  
If you are running two instances, the second has no way to know what CSeq/method the first instance sent. So the problem is most likely the CSeq logic.

Peter

________________________________
 
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:25:49 +0000
From: dra...@ya...
Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem
To: pl...@ho...; sip...@li...


 
Thanks for the reply

The CSeq is same for both the request and the response. Another thing about this scenario is that
I send REFER in one script and recieve 202 in another script ... by consecutively running two instances of SIPp ..




________________________________
 From: Peter Higginson <pl...@ho...>
To: dra...@ya...; sipp_users <sip...@li...>
Sent: Monday, 24 November, 2008 21:48:40
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem

 The only time I have seen this was due to the CSeq checking. I ended up disabling it in my local version but the mainline has been through a few revisons since I last looked at this area. So look at what you sent compared with the CSeq you received.

Peter

________________________________
 
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:14:40 +0000
From: dra...@ya...
To: sip...@li...
Subject: [Sipp-users] recv - response; problem


 
Hi,

I am having the following issue ... i know it looks wierd(bold text) but i dont know why ...

any help appreciated. thanks in advance

2008-11-24 18:41:45: Aborting call on unexpected message for Call-ID '8e31788c00
8d57502231312@2385606796': while expecting '202' response, received 'SIP/2.0 202
 Accepted
CSeq: 2 REFER
From: DEVIS_CEL <sip:+393492222222@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1
To: Susan <sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158>;tag=MS1a1
Call-ID: 8e31788c008d57502231312@2385606796
Contact: "Susan"<sip:+393331234567@10.232.35.158:5065>
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.232.35.158:5065;branch=z9hG4bK11111
Content-Length: 0


________________________________
 Click here for FREE customisable desktop wallpapers. Get them Now!

________________________________
Get the best wallpapers on the Web - FREE. Click here!


      

[Sipp-users] Fwd: Regular Expression Issue

[sumit b. <mai...@gm...>]

Please help me to resolve my issue.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sumeet Bhardwaj <sum...@pe...>
Date: Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:10 PM
Subject: [Sipp-users] Regular Expression Issue
To: sip...@li...
Cc: vis...@pe..., Samir Patni <
sam...@pe...>


 Hi all,

I am using SIPp3.1.

I am using more than one regular expression for header validation. When any
1st regular expression gets failed, SIPp logs message in error.log. But it
doesn't log the message for all the failed regular expression.

I want SIPp to log all failed regular expression in the error.log.

For example :

Suppose we have 3 regular expression as below.

1. <ereg regexp=".7777701854.*" search_in="hdr" header="From:"
check_it="true" assign_to="4" />
2. <ereg regexp=".7777701854.*" search_in="hdr" header="Contact:"
check_it="true" assign_to="9"/>
3. <ereg regexp=".INVITE.*" search_in="msg" check_it="true" assign_to="12"/>

If 1st and 2nd regular expression gest failed then SIPp logs only 1st one
and if 1st one passes and 2nd and 3rd gets failed then it logs only 2nd not
3rd one.

Does anyone know how to solve this problem?


Please help to resolve this issue.

Thanks and Regards
-Sumeet







-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sip...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users