Menu
▾
▴
sipdht-devel
|
From: naveen t <nav...@ya...> - 2008-01-11 08:53:42
|
Hi,
I successfully installed libsipdht library. After
compiling sipdht-tools, i tried starting instances of
sipdht peer nodes which form the overlay network
according to these instructions in the SIP DHT
webpage.
deploy some nodes participating in the DHT:
$ sipdht -p 6070 -s 10
$ sipdht -p 6080 -s 10 sip:localhost:6070
$ sipdht -p 6090 -s 10 sip:localhost:6080
When i start the 2nd node, it doesnt connect to the
node running on port 6070 and hence starts as a
standalone node. Am i missing any steps or
configurations?
This is the unexpected output message that i get:
navt@viduratha:~/sipdht-tools-0.4.1$ sipdht -p 6090 -s
10 sip:localhost:6070
Trying with node sip:localhost:6070...
callback failure invoked: 0
Started standalone
Could someone please clarify what could be wrong? Am i
missing out on some config.
Appreciate a reply,
regards,
Naveen
Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. To know how, go to http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html
|
|
From: Enrico M. <enr...@te...> - 2008-01-11 09:37:53
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
naveen t wrote: > I successfully installed libsipdht library. After > compiling sipdht-tools, i tried starting instances of > sipdht peer nodes which form the overlay network > according to these instructions in the SIP DHT > webpage. > > deploy some nodes participating in the DHT: > $ sipdht -p 6070 -s 10 > $ sipdht -p 6080 -s 10 sip:localhost:6070 > $ sipdht -p 6090 -s 10 sip:localhost:6080 It seems that you are using quite an outdated version; during the last year the efforts have focused on version2 (which btw should have been the only one available for download on sf page). However, if I recall correctly, at some point there where problems using the "localhost" name in URIs. I suggest to try with something like: $ sipdht -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6070 -s 10 $ sipdht -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6080 -s 10 sip:127.0.0.1:6070 $ sipdht -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6090 -s 10 sip:127.0.0.1:6080 I also suggest - even more warmly - to give a try to the new version available from http://sipdht.sourceforge.net/sipdht2/index.html -- Ciao, Enrico |
|
From: Oredope, A. <ao...@es...> - 2008-01-16 09:17:08
|
Hello Everyone, We are currently using sipdht for some experiments in our lab, but we are now interested in studying the effects of churn on the dht. =20 Is there a way of finding/measuring how long it takes the overlay to stabilize in sipdht or sipdht2?=20 Although we have not installed sipdht2 at our end but apart from the CAN overlay, are there really any advantages of sipdht2 over sipdht? I look forward to hearing from you all. Regards, Tola |
|
From: Ge@@ru <ge...@gm...> - 2008-01-16 09:28:25
|
Sipdht is an old tree that isn't supported, use of sipdht2 is advised because there are a lot of bug fix and improvements. Ge@@ru On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:16 +0000, Oredope, Adetola wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > We are currently using sipdht for some experiments in our lab, but we > are now interested in studying the effects of churn on the dht. > > Is there a way of finding/measuring how long it takes the overlay to > stabilize in sipdht or sipdht2? > > Although we have not installed sipdht2 at our end but apart from the CAN > overlay, are there really any advantages of sipdht2 over sipdht? > > I look forward to hearing from you all. > > Regards, > > Tola > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipdht-devel mailing list > Sip...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipdht-devel |
|
From: Oredope, A. <ao...@es...> - 2008-01-16 09:32:21
|
Thanks for your quick response... So is there a way I can collect data on effects of churn in sipdht2 Regards, Tola -----Original Message----- From: Ge@@ru [mailto:ge...@gm...]=20 Sent: 16 January 2008 09:28 To: Oredope, Adetola Cc: Sipdht2 devel Subject: Re: [Sipdht-devel] Stabilisation Updates Sipdht is an old tree that isn't supported, use of sipdht2 is advised because there are a lot of bug fix and improvements. Ge@@ru On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:16 +0000, Oredope, Adetola wrote: > Hello Everyone, >=20 > We are currently using sipdht for some experiments in our lab, but we > are now interested in studying the effects of churn on the dht. > =20 > Is there a way of finding/measuring how long it takes the overlay to > stabilize in sipdht or sipdht2?=20 >=20 > Although we have not installed sipdht2 at our end but apart from the CAN > overlay, are there really any advantages of sipdht2 over sipdht? >=20 > I look forward to hearing from you all. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Tola >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Sipdht-devel mailing list > Sip...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipdht-devel |
|
From: Enrico M. <enr...@te...> - 2008-01-16 10:09:32
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
Oredope, Adetola wrote: > We are currently using sipdht for some experiments in our lab, but we > are now interested in studying the effects of churn on the dht. > > Is there a way of finding/measuring how long it takes the overlay to > stabilize in sipdht or sipdht2? Well, in the sipdht2 tree there's a simulator which may help you to setup virtually any testing scenario. However, even if it "visually" tells you when the overlay is stable, so far there's no automated means to detect it. > Although we have not installed sipdht2 at our end but apart from the CAN > overlay, are there really any advantages of sipdht2 over sipdht? At http://sipdht.sf.net/sipdht2/ there's a short description of what sipdht2 is. Basically, main advantages are complete specifications, data replication, NAT traversal support, a visual simulator and a fancy GUI. Plus it is the version under development and the only one you may find some support for. -- Ciao, Enrico |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X