[Siop-development] Anybody up for a code review?

[Rapheal K. <ra...@ma...>]

  Thanks to those who are on this list.

  SIOP development has ended up going really well since I switched to Ruby.  
It's a much better language for me as it has real theoretical objects in a 
way that I think Python sort of lacks.  This really helped get things jump 
started.

  For the most part, the over-all SIOP protocol structure is looking good... 
adding new commands and types as I have taken to calling things, is 
relatively easy, and it functions almost at Level 0 functionality.

  Level 0 functionality is what I am defining as the absolute minimum parts of 
the SIOP protocol required to excersize all of things that are capable to do 
with SIOP.  The levels above 0 are meant to further abstract the differences 
between different programming languages (for example, index based access to 
values, operator calling, etc.).

  If anyone is interested, feel free to do a code review of the Ruby code.  I 
am going to start to re-write the Python stuff, so don't even bother.  I know 
at least one of you can be a right bastard about doing reviews, and that's 
what is necessary.

  - Rafe