From: Joschka B. <jos...@am...> - 2008-03-11 13:04:55
|
Hi Sander, hi all, I just tested the current CVS version including Sander's changes. I only ran a simple test with 10 agentspark agents, but everything on one machine (Mac Pro). The simulation was running very smoothly, no LCP errors or time skipping messages for the most part; I only got time skips towards the end of the "game", but the values very quite small (sth. like 0.004) and there was a lot of console output from the talkative agentspark agents ;-) It would be nice to test with more advanced agents; can someone provide a binary that uses the new soccerbotcomp.rsg file, please? Other than that, great work Sander! :-D Cheers, Joschka |
From: Sander v. D. <sgv...@gm...> - 2008-03-11 20:40:41
|
Hi, Glad to see it works well! I have put together a quick binary of basically our agent used in Atlanta, but with the possibility to use a different rsg file. I placed it at http://www.ai.rug.nl/~sgdijk/batscomptest20080311.tar.gz. Run it using: ./humanoidbat -c lgb.xml -r soccerbotcomp.rsg -u 1 -t TEAMNAME where -r gives the rsg file to use, -u gives the uniform number and -t the teamname. using ./humanoidbat -c lgb.xml defaults to -r soccerbot056.rsg -u 0 -t BATS. On my system (Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz, NVidia GeForce 7600GT) I can run 3vs3 smoothly, with some skipping time messages occuring when 3 or more agents form a pile (with the 056 model they occur at every agent contact, often resulting in LCP errors). With 4vs4 I get skipping time messages all the time, but simulation still seems stable. @Sahar: what kind of errors do you get? I get some questions about the latex documentation at the end of the make process, if I answer those with X he just goes on and finishes compiling. Sander On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Sahar Asadi <sah...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Joschka, > > wow, great :-) > I wanted to run the CVS version and I got errors in installation. Then I > became busy with qualification till now. But I try to do the test also (on > network if I can). > > I have binaries from Atlanta but they are not with the new agent. > > Best, > Sahar > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Joschka Boedecker < > jos...@am...> wrote: > > > Hi Sander, hi all, > > > > I just tested the current CVS version including Sander's changes. I > > only ran a simple test with 10 agentspark agents, but everything on > > one machine (Mac Pro). The simulation was running very smoothly, no > > LCP errors or time skipping messages for the most part; I only got > > time skips towards the end of the "game", but the values very quite > > small (sth. like 0.004) and there was a lot of console output from the > > talkative agentspark agents ;-) > > > > It would be nice to test with more advanced agents; can someone > > provide a binary that uses the new soccerbotcomp.rsg file, please? > > > > Other than that, great work Sander! :-D > > > > Cheers, > > Joschka > > > > |
From: Joschka B. <jos...@am...> - 2008-03-12 09:11:12
|
Hi Sander, On Mar 12, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Sander van Dijk wrote: > Glad to see it works well! I have put together a quick binary of > basically our agent used in Atlanta, but with the possibility to use > a different rsg file. I placed it at http://www.ai.rug.nl/~sgdijk/batscomptest20080311.tar.gz > . Run it using: Great, thanks a lot! > I get some questions about the latex documentation at the end of the > make process, if I answer those with X he just goes on and finishes > compiling. What errors do you get there? Cheers, Joschka |
From: Sahar A. <sah...@gm...> - 2008-03-11 19:26:15
|
Hi Joschka, wow, great :-) I wanted to run the CVS version and I got errors in installation. Then I became busy with qualification till now. But I try to do the test also (on network if I can). I have binaries from Atlanta but they are not with the new agent. Best, Sahar On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Joschka Boedecker < jos...@am...> wrote: > Hi Sander, hi all, > > I just tested the current CVS version including Sander's changes. I > only ran a simple test with 10 agentspark agents, but everything on > one machine (Mac Pro). The simulation was running very smoothly, no > LCP errors or time skipping messages for the most part; I only got > time skips towards the end of the "game", but the values very quite > small (sth. like 0.004) and there was a lot of console output from the > talkative agentspark agents ;-) > > It would be nice to test with more advanced agents; can someone > provide a binary that uses the new soccerbotcomp.rsg file, please? > > Other than that, great work Sander! :-D > > Cheers, > Joschka > |
From: Oliver O. <oli...@cs...> - 2008-03-12 00:26:04
|
Hi all, On 12/03/2008, at 12:04 AM, Joschka Boedecker wrote: > I just tested the current CVS version including Sander's changes. I > only ran a simple test with 10 agentspark agents, but everything on > one machine (Mac Pro). The simulation was running very smoothly, no > LCP errors or time skipping messages for the most part; I only got > time skips towards the end of the "game", but the values very quite > small (sth. like 0.004) and there was a lot of console output from the > talkative agentspark agents ;-) > Other than that, great work Sander! :-D I agree, sounds great :-) (maybe in RoboCup '09 simleague can be held on Macs ;-) I've just read that the all new gcc has optimisation flags for core 2 CPU's, this might give an extra bit of performance. ("Tuning for Intel Core 2 processors is available via -mtune=core2 and -march=core2." http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html) keep up the good work everyone ;-) Oliver |