From: Joschka B. <jbo...@un...> - 2007-06-19 16:01:37
|
Hi Yuan, On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 17:42 +0800, Yuan Xu wrote: > I have tried on this work, > after some testing, I think maybe we also need to restrict the max > request joint angle velocity. Once again, thanks for all the testing :-) > After changes (set vel to 0 while out of range in effector ), > the agent falls down on the ground while it requests the Rle5_6 to 9000 deg/sec, > but the foots were twitching. > But while the agent request 90000 deg/sec, the robot were flying, ( > not disjoint, a little better than before ). > I think the 9000 deg/sec is the highest reasonable value ( 180deg/0.02s ), > even more less value is acceptable, since we can not control the robot > with such velocity properly. That sounds still quite fast, faster than most real robots for sure. The HOAP-2 robot has very strong motors, and in an accident, I saw it jumping from 0 to 90 degrees almost instantly (very scary!), but it wasn't that fast I bet. I wouldn't mind restricting to 9000 deg/sec for now, it should certainly not be more than that. However, it's another restriction, and some teams might not be happy about it :-/ Could you control the robot reliably with the restriction of 9000 deg/sec? > And there is a parameter named dParamFudgeFactor in ODE relative to > this issue. ( chapter 7 ) > Setting the value smaller will be also helpful. ( another parameter ;-\ ) > > What about your idea? Yes, I think you're right. Did you find any good value? Keep up the good work, Joschka |