Re: [simspark-devel] [simspark-svn] SF.net SVN: simspark:[118] branches/multiphys

[Hedayat V. <hed...@ai...>]

Hi,
IMHO using a GenericPhysicsObject class for passing all parameters is 
not very nice. For example, it doesn't show that CRM function needs a 
matrix. I suggest defining a class for each type: e.g. 
GenericPhysicsMatrix for functions which need a matrix.
Also, if engine specific classes inherit from generic classes 
(ODEMatrixClass inherited from both GenericPhysicsMatrix and dMatrix3, 
or inherited from GenericPhysicsMatrix and having a dMatrix3 member), 
you won't need to cast the object to the Generic class when passing 
object as a function parameter.

BTW, use whatever you prefer.

Thanks a lot,
Hedayat

On ۰۹/۱۲/۱۰  12:04, a-...@us... wrote:
> Revision: 118
>            http://simspark.svn.sourceforge.net/simspark/?rev=118&view=rev
> Author:   a-held
> Date:     2009-12-10 08:34:56 +0000 (Thu, 10 Dec 2009)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Searched and renamed all CCylinders, CappedCylinders and Capped Cylinders to Capsule
> Implemented bridge pattern for CapsuleCollider
> Provided bridge pattern for ConeCollider
> Declared GenericPhysicsObject class that can be cast to in order to pass pointers
>      to engine-specific objects on to the abstract layer (like void*, but cleaner)
>