Re: [simspark-devel] integrated_agent_v3

[Hedayat V. <hed...@ai...>]

Hi Markus,
Glad to hear that! :)
But (well, I wonder if I'm getting too sensitive about this :( ), it 
might be better to find a way to avoid the overhead of calling a virtual 
function?! (Sorry again,  I think I'm going too far in this direction! 
Is it really a overhead which I should think about?)

Thanks a lot,
Hedayat

/*Markus Rollmann <rol...@un...>*/ wrote on 04/13/2008 
02:30:51 PM:
> Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> [...]
>>> The downside is we cannot provide different loglevels (i.e. debug, 
>>> normal etc. for one agent channel). One possibility would be to 
>>> provide multiple bases like eAgentNormal, eAgentDebug etc. and 
>>> offset them. This could be hidden behind a nice interface like 
>>> "GetLog()->AgentDebug(agentId)"
>> Or maybe each agent should have it's own LogServer instance?!
>
> I like that idea... We could install a LogServer instance below each 
> Behavior class. Further the Object::GetLog() function should become 
> vritual (see zeitgeist\object.h). Called from within a behavior class 
> it would return the LogServer instance assigned to the agent, (maybe a 
> direct child) and return the default LogServer instance otherwise.
>
>> Also notice that priority levels should be powers of 2. So, (at least 
>> currently) we can have at most 32 priority levels.
>
> Your're right. Id didn't notice that. I favor the idea of separate 
> LogServcer instances (or a similar concept)
>
> cheers,
> Markus
>