Re: [simspark-devel] CVS tagging

[Joschka B. <jos...@am...>]

Hey Sander,

On Mar 3, 2008, at 6:23 AM, Sander van Dijk wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Joschka Boedecker <
> jos...@am...> wrote:
>
>> I think we don't actually have an established
>> protocol yet. Tagging the target branch before and after the merge
>> sounds reasonable I think. Any other opinions?
>>
>
> I think tagging the branch after merging with the trunk is good too,  
> when
> development on that branch might continue.

Yes, I agree.

> This way on a second merge you
> can easily apply only new changes, see [1] point 4.

Sorry, the reference was missing ;-)

Concerning naming the branches, I don't think we had anything  
established there either. Do you have a suggestion for a standard from  
now on?

Cheers,
Joschka