From: Sander v. D. <sgv...@gm...> - 2008-03-02 21:23:26
|
Hi, On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Joschka Boedecker < jos...@am...> wrote: > I think we don't actually have an established > protocol yet. Tagging the target branch before and after the merge > sounds reasonable I think. Any other opinions? > I think tagging the branch after merging with the trunk is good too, when development on that branch might continue. This way on a second merge you can easily apply only new changes, see [1] point 4. Sander |