Re: [Simpletest-support] Cannot mock if there is a protected abstract function

[Manuel V. <man...@gm...>]

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Manuel Vacelet
<man...@gm...> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Marcus Baker <ma...@wo...> wrote:
>> Hi...
>>
>> Nicolas Terray wrote:
>>> Is it a bug?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> My next chance to look at this will be towards the end of next week.
>> SimpleTest has two strategies for mocking, subclassing or creating a
>> fake class with an identical interface. In this case it tried to
>> subclass when it wasn't capable. This should be easily fixable.
>
> Hello Marcus,
>
> Just for my understanding, if it's not too long to explain, when do
> you subclass and when do you "fake class" ?
>
> I realize it's probably why it's not possible to use proper type
> hinting with mocked objects.

I just tested the SVN version of simpletest and the problem I
highlight is fixed. Sorry for the noise!

Manuel