Re: [Simpletest-support] Strange behavior with expectError

[Chris C. <ch...@w3...>]

You're right, that does seem broken.  I haven't tested it myself but  
from the code you posted you should get a failure in test_m1 but not  
in test_m2.  It's as if SimpleTest is not resetting state correctly  
between the test methods and it thinks it's still waiting for an error  
to be raised.


On 22/10/2009, at 2:37 AM, Nicolas Terray wrote:

> 2009/10/21 Jason Sweat <jsw...@ya...>:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> Your code throws an exception, and does not raise an error, so the  
>> unit test is telling you that.  Everything appears to be working as  
>> expected with SimpleTest.
>>
>
> Why the Fail message speaks about test_m2 ? (tests shouldn't be  
> independent?)
> Why does it say "Expected true, got [Boolean: false]" ? (I didn't make
> any assertion about True or False values)
> Why does my test go green if i remove the function test_m2() ?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart  
> your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and  
> stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
> _______________________________________________
> Simpletest-support mailing list
> Sim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simpletest-support