Re: [Simple-support] android performance

[Niall G. <gal...@ya...>]

Try 2.6.9 it has a number of improvements. On Android Simple should be using XmlPull, this has a similar performance profile to StAX only its more lightweight. You should also try to use the Proguard obfuscation, it improves the performance. ttps://niallg@simple.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/simple/trunk/download/stream/proguard.pro 

If you still notice bad performance or inconsistent times you will need to profile, perhaps there is some I/O bottle neck. Try serialize to a byte array output stream or a StringWriter and check out the times.

--- On Mon, 19/11/12, stephen toner <ste...@gm...> wrote:

> From: stephen toner <ste...@gm...>
> Subject: [Simple-support] android performance
> To: sim...@li...
> Received: Monday, 19 November, 2012, 1:22 AM
> Hi,I'm having some difficulty
> deserializing some xml on Android - (it's about 100KB)
> and I've found that whilst occasionally it deserializes
> in a second or so - it very often takes 15-20 seconds.  I
> was wondering if anyone else has seen this issue (I'm
> using the 2.6.7).  
> I was trying digging around - and as far as I can see
> on Android internally it only uses DOM? Is this correct?
> Should I be also adding the STax jars to my
> project?ThanksStephen
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT.
> Free Trial
> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant
> support
> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more
> value-add services
> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple-support mailing list
> Sim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-support
>