Re: [Simple-support] Extended @Version

[Niall G. <gal...@ya...>]

Hi,

Yes, this should be a very easy thing to do. I am planning a release soon for 2.6.1, I will take a look at addressing the @Version annotation in such a way.

Thanks for the feedback.
Niall

--- On Tue, 19/7/11, Stefanato Federico (KGRQ 2) <fed...@cr...> wrote:

> From: Stefanato Federico (KGRQ 2) <fed...@cr...>
> Subject: [Simple-support] Extended @Version
> To: sim...@li...
> Received: Tuesday, 19 July, 2011, 4:40 AM
> Hi Niall,
> 
> the usage of @Version annotation is very powerful where -
> as in my case
> - the overall structure changes quite often.
> 
> Unfortunately, the annotation works only at field level and
> I need a
> class - either concrete or abstract - to provide such field
> (in
> interfaces it doesn't work).
> 
> It would be of great advantage if I could annotate a super
> interface in
> order to centralize the versioning management.
> Something as:
> 
> @Version(name="xml-version", revision="1.7")
> public interface XmlSerializable{}
> 
> Do you foresee any kind of extension in versioning
> capabilities?
> Otherwise, could you suggest me an equivalent strategy?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> federico
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
> Research study explores the data loss prevention market.
> Includes in-depth
> analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the
> criteria used to
> evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP
> solutions.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
> _______________________________________________
> Simple-support mailing list
> Sim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-support
>