Re: [Simple-support] How to create inner children without creating inner class?

[Cristian <cri...@el...>]

I wanted to do something like:

<Root>
   <namespace:Children>
      <InnerChildren>SomethingM</InnerChildren>


   </namespace:Children>
</Root>


I asked on SO and got this answer:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4715148/how-to-create-inner-children-without-creating-another-class

So... in order to emulate a namespace using paths, I will have to do
something like @Path("namespace:Children"). If I use the CameStyle class to
format the XML, what I get is <NamespaceChildren> which is obviously wrong.
Anyway, I'd be nice if the Path extension supported namespaces.

Thanks.

2011/1/18 Niall Gallagher <gal...@ya...>

> Hi,
>
> Can you send me an example of the XML you want to generate?
>
> Niall
>
> --- On *Mon, 17/1/11, Cristian <cri...@el...>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Cristian <cri...@el...>
> Subject: Re: [Simple-support] How to create inner children without creating
> inner class?
> To: sim...@li...
> Received: Monday, 17 January, 2011, 10:07 AM
>
>
> All right... I see that I can accomplish that by using Paths. This way:
>
> @org.simpleframework.xml.Root
>
>
> class Root {
>
>
>    @Element
>
>
>    @Path("children")
>    private final String innerChildren;
>
>
>
>
>    public Root(String name){
>
>
>        innerChildren = name;
>
>
>    }
> }
>
>
>
> The problem is that now I want to give a namespace to the path... but I
> have found no way to do so. If I do @Path("myns:children") I get
> <mynschildren> instead of <myns:children>.
>
> Thanks for you help.
>
> 2011/1/17 Cristian <cri...@el...<http://mc/compose?to=...@el...>
> >
>
>  I need to generate an XML like this:
>
> <Root>
>    <Children>
>       <InnerChildren>SomethingM</InnerChildren>
>
>    </Children>
>
> </Root>
>
> The simplest solution is creating an inner class on the Root class:
>
> @Root
> class Root{
>
>     @Element
>     Children element;
>
>
>     @Root
>
>     private static class Children{
>
>         @Element
>
>
>         String innerChildren;
>     }
>
> }
>
> But I want to avoid that inner class creation, since it will make things
> look strange while using Root objects. Is there anyway I can achieve that
> result without using inner classes?
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
> Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
> malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
> can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple-support mailing list
> Sim...@li...<http://mc/compose?to=...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-support
>
>
>