Re: [Simple-support] Serialization and Deserialization through sockets

[Niall G. <gal...@ya...>]

Hi, 

I am not really that sure I understand what you are asking. What do you mean by "scope" here? Do you mean your class loader does not have access to some of the classes?

Thanks,
Niall

--- On Mon, 5/4/09, danlourd <dan...@ya...> wrote:

> From: danlourd <dan...@ya...>
> Subject: [Simple-support] Serialization and Deserialization through sockets
> To: sim...@li...
> Date: Monday, May 4, 2009, 6:25 PM
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We have this common interface ITest that all our client
> implements. Each
> client have different implementation of ITest. We serialize
> this objects and
> send it it through a socket. Now on the other end of that
> socket we
> deserialize that object.
> 
> I'm having problem deserializing that object because it
> can't map to a
> "class" within that scope. Is there a way in simple xml
> while deserializing
> to force to map an object known within the scope where an
> object is being
> deserialized?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan Ramirez
> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Serialization-and-Deserialization-through-sockets-tp23379532p23379532.html
> Sent from the Simple XML Serialization mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY
> circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world
> - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With
> the NEW KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with
> all image 
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Simple-support mailing list
> Sim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-support
>