Re: [Simple-support] Difference between DefaultStrategy and TreeStrategy?
Brought to you by:
niallg
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Simple-support] Difference between DefaultStrategy and TreeStrategy?
|
From: Niall G. <gal...@ya...> - 2009-01-29 18:14:59
|
Hi,
They do the exact same thing. I did not make DefaultStrategy public for a number of reasons. For one I hate "Default" objects and for another I wanted to have stock strategy types in a single location, without any package cycles. So you can use TreeStrategy to get the exact same functionality as DefaultStrategy.
Niall
--- On Thu, 1/29/09, Kevin Day <for...@tr...> wrote:
> From: Kevin Day <for...@tr...>
> Subject: [Simple-support] Difference between DefaultStrategy and TreeStrategy?
> To: "Simple" <sim...@li...>
> Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 9:51 AM
> <div id=yiv201421765><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
> "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <html><head>
> <style type="text/css">#yiv201421765 P,
> #yiv201421765 UL, #yiv201421765 OL, #yiv201421765 DL,
> #yiv201421765 DIR, #yiv201421765 MENU, #yiv201421765 PRE
> {margin:0 auto;}</style>
>
> </head>
> <font face="Arial" size="2">
> <div>Just curious if there is any functional
> difference between these two. The source has some
> slight differences, but they seem like they are doing pretty
> much the same thing.</div>
> <div> </div>
> <div>Thanks!</div>
> <div> </div>
> <div>- K</div>
> <div> </div>
> <div> </div>
> <div></div>
> <div> </div></font></html>
>
> </div>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword_______________________________________________
> Simple-support mailing list
> Sim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-support
|
