Re: [Simple-support] details on jar dependencies

[Niall G. <gal...@ya...>]

Hi,

What problem do you see? Is there a stack trace? These
libraries are loaded via the normal class loading
process.

Niall

--- Michael Ebstyne <meb...@ma...> wrote:

> I love simple-xml.  But, I presently have one issue
> with it that I'm
> hoping I can get some help with.  It relies on the
> stax-1.2.0.jar
> and the stax-api-1.0.1.jar.  Due to some reasons out
> of my control
> I have to modify the source code in those libraries.
>  Thus far I
> have been unable to locate the source.  It would be
> really helpful
> if someone could get me pointed in the right
> direction or give me
> a clear explanation as to why this is a lost cause.
> 
> Thanks much,
> 
> Michael
> 
> PS For those curious as to why I'm in this pickle...
>  I'm using a  
> scripting
> framework that did not do a very good job
> implementing it's class  
> loader.
> As a consequence, in the framework, all java
> libraries that call the  
> class
> loader via the
> Thread.getCurrentThread().getClassLoader() interface
> do
> not actually get the full class library.  Instead
> one must invoke the  
> class
> loader via the object.getClass().getClassLoader()
> interface.  It's  
> subtle.
> But, the effect is night and day for this situation.
>  And,  
> unfortunately,
> abandoning the scripting framework is not an option.
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio
> 2008.
>
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Simple-support mailing list
> Sim...@li...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-support
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ