Ken Weinert wrote:
> Just curious if anyone is still using this.
>
> I got into in in a sort of backwards way - from the autotools book. I
> am attempting to learn the proper way of setting up a somewhat major
> open source project so I jumped into the complex version of the code.
> At first it was just for setup and such, but after looking at the code
> I thought maybe I'd try to use it as a base since my project is also
> designed to use "plugins" (loadable modules.)
>
> I am having a small problem though. It doesn't look as if any of the
> modules are getting loaded. I figured that would be normal enough
> since I made all those changes so I thought I'd go back to the
> original and try and track down where I'd gone wrong in my changes.
>
> Unfortunately the latest code downloaded from SF has exactly the same
> problem. from appearances none of the modules are loaded.
>
> I'll presume this is some sort of basic dumb thing I've done and it
> will sound familiar and someone here will say "Did you try ...?" and
> I'll be back on track.
>
> Thanks for any info.
Hi Ken,
Yep, I'm still here :-)
I expect the problem is that the sicsh code is bitrotted with respect
to the latest autotools. The goat book is over 4 years old now, and
a lot has changed since then...
I'll have a little time in the new year to bring it up to date. In
the mean time you might want to check out CVS GNU M4 which also has
a loadable module system built around libltdl. It makes use of newer
features in CVS Libtool (branch-2-0), and is a bit of a pain to
bootstrap from CVS. If you get stuck with this, or you'd rather see
a sicsh that works with current autotools, then ping me in the new
year and I'll do what I can to help.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. gary@{lilith.warpmail.net,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
|
