Le 27 mars 07 =C3=A0 15:17, ti...@da... a =C3=A9crit :
>> so I want to ask you if you prefer a GUI that permits to
>> edit every aspect of a sound file (Anvil), or one that
>> hide some stuff from the file format, for the sake of
>> "correctness". What do you think ?
> Interesting question. I had similar one about some aspects
> of shapes files, and chose to blindly allow complete
> editing.
> But then I realized that some things are really a waste of
> user
> attention (for example the bitmap column order flag).
> The problem is: what if you open a broken sounds file which
> has
> different settings for both versions? Which version will you
> present in the GUI? You may check for this and ask the user;
> this could be a nice behaviour, since I guess there won't be
> many broken sounds files around. In a later release we can
> introduce a checkbox that allows separate editing, maybe
> warning
> the user about the badness of doing so. So I say, do like
> Wail.
I've started going that way. And I think the doc/view framework =20
enable multiple Views per Document, so we cand have a "Wail" and an =20
"Anvil"-like editor, wth no problem...
tiennou
|
