From: tiennou <tie...@gm...> - 2007-03-27 13:23:21
|
Le 27 mars 07 =C3=A0 15:17, ti...@da... a =C3=A9crit : >> so I want to ask you if you prefer a GUI that permits to >> edit every aspect of a sound file (Anvil), or one that >> hide some stuff from the file format, for the sake of >> "correctness". What do you think ? > Interesting question. I had similar one about some aspects > of shapes files, and chose to blindly allow complete > editing. > But then I realized that some things are really a waste of > user > attention (for example the bitmap column order flag). > The problem is: what if you open a broken sounds file which > has > different settings for both versions? Which version will you > present in the GUI? You may check for this and ask the user; > this could be a nice behaviour, since I guess there won't be > many broken sounds files around. In a later release we can > introduce a checkbox that allows separate editing, maybe > warning > the user about the badness of doing so. So I say, do like > Wail. I've started going that way. And I think the doc/view framework =20 enable multiple Views per Document, so we cand have a "Wail" and an =20 "Anvil"-like editor, wth no problem... tiennou |