From: Tito D. C. <ti...@da...> - 2007-03-16 17:46:41
|
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 18:32 +0100, tiennou wrote: > Yes, that was intentional, because I tough it would be more efficient > to check for loading errors than checking size... But it's right a > Shapes file with an invalid number of headers is definitely not a > Shape files, so that can be added back... I'll do it now... Yep, if something can be said FOR SURE about a Shapes file it's that it can't be less than COLLECTIONS_IN_FILE * SIZEOF_collection_header! Bye T -- Physics is reverse engineering |