Re: [Shapefusion-devel] status

[tiennou <tie...@gm...>]

Le 21 f=C3=A9vr. 07 =C3=A0 13:50, ti...@da... a =C3=A9crit :

>> Hmm, my approach had the
>> advantage of not separating the Shapes/ ShapesEditor
> Actually, I see this separation as a good thing...
>
>> =46rom my point of view, I'm not really fond of the
>> wxDocument way,  but it can be enhanced by subclassing
>> stuff, so that's not really a problem...
> There are many things I don't like about wx, too. But from
> experience I think that the final result is good if you try
> to follow wx accurately. Let's see if this holds also with
> this wxDoc stuff...

I'm commiting right now.

I've made some progress... I think reusing the ShapeEditor code won't =20=

be a problem, but as I need loading Shapes file to continue, I moved =20
to trying to actually load data the wxDoc way...

I'm in a big need of help there, because I'm thinking of Object-=20
Orienting the Marathon structs so I could just write =20
ShapesDocument::LoadObject(), and it will issue =20
ShapesChunk::LoadObject(), which will work as a a chain... I need =20
some help from you to (re)do that.

I'm also trying to remove everything std (vectors principally) and =20
changing them into wxList subclasses to ensure portability... It =20
won't be a problem for you ?

tiennou