|
From: Todd L. M. <tm...@ha...> - 2001-03-16 23:16:32
|
> Excellent. An option may be to try using their new tracker system and put > this in as bugs/feature requests. I'm of the opinion that the wiki may be > better if the list remains minimal and the # of bugs is small. With more > though, it may be easier to manage in the sf tracker. I stuck them all in as feature requests. We can move them to bugs later, if necessary. I decide to stick them in the sf tracker to inflate our statistics :) > Perhaps just delete pages that have no text in them? That way users delete > pages by simply clearing the text? I believe the current behavior is just > to store a completely blank page which seems weird/wrong anyhow. Good point. I added this, and will think about if for a while. > extensive wiki statistics. Pages, edits per month, # of members, size > (MB), total outgoing links, total interwiki links, etc etc etc. Most of > its probably just foo-foo statistics but should be relatively easy to > gather when doing one of your backups/snapshots since you'll be touching > all the pages anyhow. I'd be interested to see if we could get some useful > numbers that correlate to the liveliness, freshness, connectedness, value > or "knowledge content" of a wiki. Mostly just something I'm interested in > and has no immediate practical application that I can see. (that's why its > on the wish list). Well, it shouldn't be too hard to add. We'll see how my voluminous spare time slices. -_Quinn |