|
From: Iain S. <iai...@ya...> - 2001-01-27 21:16:19
|
On 27 Jan 01, at 1:00, Todd L. Miller wrote: > formatting timestamp, so that's OK. The question is how the timestamp > came to be that way on these certain pages. The only thing that seems to > be common between them is that the last edit is was in 2000 (And probably Hmm. Not entirely sure. I do know that the current jos wiki is not w2k compliant (there are a couple w2k bugs in there). So if you're using wiki related information to generate the timestamp on imports, you're probably running into an existing w2k problem with the old wiki. -iain |