Re: [sfWiki-devel] status report

[Todd L. M. <tm...@ha...>]

> I think you should approach this in the opposite direction.

	I wanted to support HTML in the Wiki because it's going to be
easier for some people to write the HTML than learn the
WikiMarkup.  TWiki says it supports 'most' HTML tags, though I didn't
find a full list.

> Ideally, wiki markups and no html should be use.  Realistically,
> wiki markups and some limited set of html will be needed.

	Actually, we could almost certainly get away with no HTML markup
at all; there's nothing intrinsically difficult about it.  It's just that
past a certain point, certain features make more sense in HTML, because
they're advanced enough that the author is likely to know the HTML to
create them.  However, I suspect that most of these features are potential
security holes :)


	I'll give it some more thought, but before I do -- I allowed
nesting of bold/italic/fixed-font, which it doesn't look like the normal
wiki does.  There a reason for that?

-_Quinn