Re: [sfWiki-devel] Re: new look for sfWiki

[Iain S. <iai...@ya...>]

On 8 May 00, at 18:02, Todd L. Miller wrote:

> > Looks good.  The web header, and web footer table row (highlighted 
> > in yellow section) needs to have its width set to 100% (right now it 
> > doesn't span the entire page).  Otherwise, looks pretty slick.
> 
> 	Personally, I thought setting them both to 60% looked kind of
> nice, but I'm not much of a web designer.  If you feel like futzing with
> them yourself, [format-<Web>-header] and [format-<Web>-footer] are the
> topics to adjust them.

acht.  I forgot that you have them edited from within the wiki itself.  
(very slick)  Since this is going to be a "protected" admin only 
feature, should we make an admin "home page" with normal 
choices for the admin to make via the web interface.  I can easily 
see myself forgetting that I can do this via the web (or the format for 
the page names) if its not put into a "list of admin actions".

> 	A site import script is a very good idea.  The hard part will
> gettign the raw text to import; once we have that, things are easy,
> because saveWikiTopic() is in a .inc file -- so we just call it on our
> import, and all the rendering and linking, etc, stuff automagically
> happens.

That's easy.  I can provide a zip or tar-gzip of all our files when you 
want to test it out... of course, we may want to test on a smaller 
number of pages... :)  I think the most difficult task is handling 
"contention" with a page already in the wiki...  I'd probably just 
ignore it and allow the overwrite... the older version will be available 
for checking (perhaps it should be flagged though so we can see 
how many overlaps there are and what pages should be reviewed... 
a simple, static web page with links to the pages would be 
sufficient and easy to generat).

-iain