Re: MS Free compiler

[Salvador E. T. <sal...@in...>]

On 16/09/05 18:59, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:

>On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:25:39PM -0300, Salvador Eduardo Tropea wrote:
>  
>
>>The real problem is that definitions must be done before used for
>>nmake.
>>
>>    
>>
>yup, obviously it is not a two-pass processor like gmake.
>however, i don't see how putting assignments in front of a target would
>make it secondary?
>well, i haven't looked at the makefiles recently, so i can't comment on
>them.
>  
>

Isn't just an assignment, the problem is a rule to generate a support tool.
This tool is compiler dependent and hence goes in the configuration 
"include".
This is the place where the assignment is done. So you get both and 
that's the problem.

SET

-- 
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: se...@co... se...@ie... 
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013