Re: MS Free compiler

[Oswald B. <os...@kd...>]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:25:39PM -0300, Salvador Eduardo Tropea wrote:
> The real problem is that definitions must be done before used for
> nmake.
> 
yup, obviously it is not a two-pass processor like gmake.
however, i don't see how putting assignments in front of a target would
make it secondary?
well, i haven't looked at the makefiles recently, so i can't comment on
them.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.