From: Juan P. <jjs...@ig...> - 2006-04-26 12:52:26
|
Hi Miriam, On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:35:27PM +0200, Miriam Pena Villanueva wrote: > I haven't thought about it yet, but with this separation it could be > necessarie to develop new processes in the server for each client. If we > assume we have to implement the "obervers design pattern" i will talk in > another mail, command channel will encrease with big amount of > computation that shall not be mixed with data's one. From the Serval development team it was always more or less clear that the separation between data and control information would be a good idea. It is something that was never done because of the lack of time. I would be nice if you could came up with a 2-3 pages small paper with the following structure: - brief description of the current architecture of serval - description of the performance limitations with examples - new architecture proposal with two channels for data and control - performance advantages of the new approach with examples If you send that to the list, I am sure we all could try to have a look into it, discuss for a while, and then you could probably start to implement that new version. cheers, j. |