Re: [SMW-devel] Equivalent URI

[Benedikt K. <ben...@ki...>]

Hi Yury, Hi Laurent,

Thanks for your answers. The thing is, I actually do not want to import a
whole vocabulary just for "reusing" the URI foaf:knows. I would prefer to
simply declare a property page in a wiki to have the same URI as some other.
Whether foaf:knows is used directly (which would not require a reasoner
afterwards to make use of the data), is linked using owl:sameAs (which is
mostly done in Linked Data), or is linked using owl:equivalentProperty
(which would semantically be the right thing) is not so relevant; but would
it not make sense if equivalent URI for properties worked just like for
regular pages (and maybe also for categories)?

Best,

Benedikt 


-- 
AIFB, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Phone: +49 721 608-47946 
Email: ben...@ki...
Web: http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Hauptseite/en 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: gan...@gm... [mailto:gan...@gm...] On Behalf Of
> Yury Katkov
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 8:19 AM
> To: Benedikt Kämpgen
> Cc: sem...@li...
> Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Equivalent URI
> 
> Oh, I forgot to add a link to my experiment:
> http://scratchpad.referata.com/wiki/Special:ExportRDF/Property:Mypropert
> y
> 
> Sincerely yours,
> 
> Yury V. Katkov
> WikiVote! llc
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Yury Katkov <kat...@gm...>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Hi Benedikt!
> 
> 	I think it should be considered as owl:sameAs and that's all
according
> to documentation. If you want foaf:knows property to be inferred - you
> need an inference engine or just use Import vocabulary feature.
> 
> 	However when I tried to make equivalent property at Referata I
> found that there is no owl:sameAs, but owl:equivalentProperty. That's
> weird, is that a mistake in a documentation?
> 
> 	Sincerely yours,
> 
> 	Yury V. Katkov
> 	WikiVote! llc
> 
> 
> 
> 	On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Benedikt Kämpgen
> <ben...@ki...> wrote:
> 
> 
> 		Hello,
> 
> 		I was wondering, if I declare a property page
> "Property:Knows" in SMW
> 		[[equivalent URI:: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows]
> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows%5D> ], why is this not
> 		considered in the RDF export? An equivalent relationship
> between both would
> 		be nice. A direct usage of foaf:knows in the export would
> even be better.
> 
> 		Regards,
> 
> 		Benedikt
> 
> 		--
> 		AIFB, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
> 		Phone: +49 721 608-47946
> 		Email: ben...@ki...
> 		Web: http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Hauptseite/en
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> 		All the data continuously generated in your IT
infrastructure
> 		contains a definitive record of customers, application
> performance,
> 		security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk
takes
> this
> 		data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> 		http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> 		_______________________________________________
> 		Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> 		Sem...@li...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
> 
> 
> 
>