From: Yaron K. <ya...@gm...> - 2010-10-04 17:43:06
|
Hi Stefan, Okay, cool, that's good to hear. Just to clarify on that last point - do you think there are cases when a page already has an approved revision, but you *wouldn't* want the edits to that page made by an "approver" to automatically get marked as approved? -Yaron On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Harwarth, Stefan (Bundeswehr) <Ste...@ca...> wrote: > Hi Yaron, > > yes, I think that a warning in the form should work for me :) > But I don't think that the bug was really introduced in 0.4 since I > first found it in 0.31 or so and couldn't get rid of it by updating. > > As for the auto-approval, I would be perfectly happy with your > suggestion, but maybe you could just add an option to allow a choice > between the current behaviour and the one you're suggesting. > > Stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized > environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security > easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the > two and get a better understanding. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Semediawiki-user mailing list > Sem...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user > -- WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com |