Hey,

Having a tag implementation next to the current parser function one would be acceptable. Replacing the parser function by a tag extension is not. So that would not solve the current problem.

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw
* http://blog.bn2vs.com
* http://wiki.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69 66 65!
--


On 19 July 2010 14:34, Platonides <Platonides@gmail.com> wrote:
Why not use a tag instead of a parserfunction?
You could have one point per line, with parameters (which could be
named) separated by pipes.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-user mailing list
Semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user