Having a tag implementation next to the current parser function one would be acceptable. Replacing the parser function by a tag extension is not. So that would not solve the current problem.


Jeroen De Dauw
* http://blog.bn2vs.com
* http://wiki.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69 66 65!

On 19 July 2010 14:34, Platonides <Platonides@gmail.com> wrote:
Why not use a tag instead of a parserfunction?
You could have one point per line, with parameters (which could be
named) separated by pipes.

This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
Semediawiki-user mailing list