Activity for seeddms
-
Emanuele modified a comment on discussion General Discussion
hello everyone, first of all thanks for the support you offer to all of us. I wanted to share an addition I made to the seeddms system for searching for attachments in individual documents, thus reopening this topic. The change I made is nothing more than an addition to the fulltext indexing of the sqlitefts engine. The files in question can be found at /pear/vendor/seeddms/sqlitefts/SQLiteFTS while the files involved are IndexedDocument.php & Term.php Regarding the IndexedDocument.php file I made...
-
hello everyone, first of all thanks for the support you offer to all of us. I wanted to share an addition I made to the seeddms system for searching for attachments in individual documents, thus reopening this topic. The change I made is nothing more than an addition to the fulltex indexing of the sqlitefts engine. The files in question can be found at /pear/vendor/seeddms/sqlitefts/SQLiteFTS while the files involved are IndexedDocument.php & Term.php Regarding the IndexedDocument.php file I made...
-
Dale Scott modified a comment on discussion General Discussion
I answered my own question and now can't figure out how to delete this post......
-
@steinm is it possible to use the API in a single request from a browser? To claify, could I construct a URL that would "view online" a document using the API? I read doc/README.hooks but still don't know how to use them (or why there are no View hooks listed).
-
Uwe Steinmann posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Not before november. It's basically ready but still needs some testing.
-
adi putra posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Hi Uwe, I saw that demo now running with version 6.0.29 May i ask when is the .29 version will be ready? Thanks.
-
Ip Smile posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Got it. thanks.
-
Just edit the settings.xml and set "enable2FactorAuthentication" to false.
-
Fwiw, I really like the look of the ViewDocument page on the demo site with the document preview extension. It would be a great layout when I want to mostly see the document meta-data and also having the document preview is a nice addition. Also I had never thought to "pull" the Eye icon to a new browser tab, which is very convenient. However, the preview is quite small compared to the total view and can't be exapanded to fill the window (or at least it doesn't seem to be). As a result, although...
-
Fwiw, I really like the look of the ViewDocument page on the demo site with the document preview extension. It would be a great layout when I want to mostly see the document meta-data and also having the document preview would be very convenient. Also I had never thought to "pull" the Eye icon to a new browser tab, which is convenient behavior. However, the preview is quite small compared to the total view and can't be exapanded to fill the window (or at least it doesn't seem to be). As a result,...
-
I am experimenting with 6.0.28. My question is once 2fa is turned on, and before I have setting up the authenticator in my cell phone and I locked myself out. Is there a way to turn it off?
-
I am experimenting with 6.0.28. My question is once 2fa is turned on, is there a way to turn it off?
-
I am experimenting with 6.0.28. My question is once 2fa is turned on, before saving it to take effect. Is there a way to turn it off?
-
Fwiw, I really like the look of the ViewDocument page on the demo site with the document preview extension. It would be a great layout when I want to mostly see the document meta-data and also having the document preview would be very convenient. However, the preview is quite small (2/3? of the screen area is used for meta-data), and doesn't seem to be expandable to fill the window (but even it it was, that would still be another mouse click). As a result, although the preview can be convenient and...
-
Fwiw, I like the look of the ViewDocument page on the demo site, with the document preview. It's a great layout when I need to see the document meta-data and having the document preview can be very convenient. However, it's still not a shortcut to seeing just the document as big as possible without 2/3 of the screen area being used to show meta-data - IMHO, and the current behavior is certainly not a show stopper.
-
Fwiw, I like the look of the ViewDocument page with the preview. It's a great layout when I need to see the document meta-data and seeing the actual document in a preview window can be very convenient. However, it's still not a shortcut to seeing just the document as big as possible without 2/3 of the screen area being used to show meta-data - IMHO, and the current behavior is certainly not a show stopper.
-
No, I didn't change anything.
-
The demo server responds correctly now! :-) Did you do anything specific to fix this? If not, perhaps there was a temporary intermediate network issue.
-
I wish I could help more, but I know just enough to know I practically know very little (but I'm happy to help with testing if needed)
-
I wish I could help more, but I know just enough to know I practically know very little... ;-) :-)
-
I wish I could help more, but I know just enough to know I don't know much ;-)
-
(initially reported in https://sourceforge.net/p/seeddms/discussion/general/thread/a7f1aee57f/?limit=25#c83e) Hi Uwe, I ignored the "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID" error that Chrome reported when accessing the demo site (https://demo6.seeddms.org) and then the demo site Apache httpd server reported a 421 Misdirected Request error. I created this new topic with screenshots to not pollute the original topic. Cheers, Dale
-
(initially reported in https://sourceforge.net/p/seeddms/discussion/general/thread/a7f1aee57f/?limit=25#c83e) Hi Uwe, I ignored the "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID" error that Chrome reported when accessing the demo site (https://demo6.seeddms.org and then the demo site Apache httpd server reported a 421 Misdirected Request error. I created this new topic with screenshots to not pollute the original topic. Cheers, Dale
-
(initially reported in https://sourceforge.net/p/seeddms/discussion/general/thread/a7f1aee57f/?limit=25#c83e) Hi Uwe, I ignored the "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID" error that Chrome reported when accessing the demo site (https://demo6.seeddms.org) and then the demo site Apache httpd server reported a 421 Misdirected Request error. I created this new topic with screenshots to not pollute the original topic. Cheers, Dale
-
Very strange. I checked the returned http headers with curl -I, but it all works as expected. I also checked with my mobile phone to make sure I use a different DNS server. Even that works. It looks like SNI isn't working. That other certificate is probably used as a default if host identification doesn't work.
-
(initially reported in https://sourceforge.net/p/seeddms/discussion/general/thread/a7f1aee57f/?limit=25#c83e) Hi Uwe, I ignored the "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID" error that Chrome reported when accessing the demo site (https://demo6.seeddms.org) and then the demo site Apache httpd server reported a 421 Misdirected Request error. I created this new topic with screenshots to not pollute the original topic. Cheers, Dale
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [cd0ec5] on Code
pass context to getAccessMode()
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [5a3ba8] on Code
some general information about converting documents
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [4ace32] on Code
Merge branch 'seeddms-5.1.x' into seeddms-6.0.x
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [f19552] on Code
set memcached server if php has support for it
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [2d6c0e] on Code
check if folder tree is enable when creating javascript code
-
The error "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID" indicates that something is wrong with the certificate, but it's valid an my browsers (chrome and firefox) do not complain about it. The extension is currently not in the store. I'll polish it and put it in the store soon. Clicking on the title of a document and clicking the Eye icon will go to the ViewDocument page. The difference is the way it is done. In 'onepage' mode, the click on the title is actually handled by javascript while the Eye icon is...
-
Thanks Uwe, what is the extension called? I don't see anything called "document preview" or similar in the store. Unfortunately I can't investigate the demo site because my browser (Chrome) reports "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID". Is clicking the "Eye" icon really the same as clicking on the document itself? If they really do have the same behavior, imho re-purposing the "Eye" icon to "view" the contents of a document doesn't seem so much an extension as it would be a core UX improvement. Are...
-
Thanks Uwe, what is the extension called? I don't see anything called "document preview" or similar in the store. Unfortunately I can't investigate the demo site because my browser (Chrome) reports "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID". Is clicking the "Eye" icon really the same as clicking on the document itself? If they really do have the same behavior, imho re-purposing the "Eye" icon to "view" the contents of a document doesn't seem so much an extension as it would be a core UX improvement. Are...
-
Thanks Uwe, what is the extension called? I don't see anything called "document preview" or similar in the store. Unfortunately I can't investigate the demo site because my browser (Chrome) reports "net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID". Is clicking the "Eye" icon really the same as clicking on the document itself? If they really do have the same behavior, imho re-purposing the "Eye" icon to "view" the contents of a document doesn't seem so much an extension as it would be a core UX improvement. Are...
-
At the folder level, a "view online" button for documents in a folder would make viewing a PDF/JPG/PNG/...-format document much more convenient than it is now. With the current behavior I need to click to the document and then mouse navigate and click the (somewhat small) "view online" button. It's an annoying extra click (and arguably might break the metalphor of the document being a surregate for the file). I don't always want to look at the approval and revision history for a document, sometimes...
-
There is actually a non free extension which shows the document when clicking on the preview images in a list of documents. It's installed in the demo at https://demo6.seeddms.org. The Eye icon was added when the 'onepage' mode was introduced. Users complained about not being able anymore to pull a document on a new browser tab. This was possible when the title of a document was still a link to the ViewDocument page. So, I added the Eye icon which can be pulled on a new browser tab.
-
At the folder level, a "view online" button for documents in a folder would make viewing a PDF/JPG/PNG/...-format document much more convenient than it is now. With the current behavior I need to click to the document and then mouse navigate and click the (somewhat small) "view online" button. It's an annoying extra click (and arguably might break the metalphor of the document being a surregate for the file). I don't always want to look at the approval and revision history for a document, sometimes...
-
Vliegende Hollander modified a comment on discussion General Discussion
user access : - I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for normal user or guest. I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded as a whole file. I do want it to be viewed however withe automatic "guest" login.
-
user access : - I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for normal user I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded as a whole file. I do want it to be viewed however withe automatic "guest" login.
-
what i do not grasp is that I cannot block view mode from downloading
-
what i do not grasp is that -the user 'guest' with role guest (which i prefer for automatic connection) has no view rights - the user guest with role 'user' has no view more rights as in guest role - the normal user has no more view right as the ones mentioned before for viewing EXCEPT there is a link'hand' which appears on the 'actual version' button but gives no return in click
-
what i do not grasp is that -the user 'guest' with role guest (which i prefer for automatic connection) has no view rights even when set in advanced view - the user guest with role 'user' has no view more rights as in guest role - the normal user has no more view right as the ones mentioned before for viewing EXCEPT there is a link'hand' which appears on the 'actual version' button but gives no return in click
-
user access : - I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for normal user - A guest user cannot see a view of the document I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded as a whole file. I do want it to be viewed however withe automatic "guest" login.
-
what i do not grasp is that -the user 'guest' with role guest (which i prefer for automatic connection) has no view rights even when set in advanced view - the user guest with role 'user' has no view more rights as in guest role - the normal user has no more view right as the ones mentioned before for viewing except there is a link'hand' which appears on the 'actual version' button but gives no return in click
-
what i do not grasp is that -the user 'guest' with role guest (which i prefer for automatic connection) has no view rights even when set in advanced view - the user guest with role 'user' has no more rights as in guest role - the normal user has no more right as the ones mentioned before for viewing except there is a link'hand' which appears on the 'actual version' button but gives no return in click
-
advanced access : - I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for normal user - A guest user cannot see a view of the document I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded as a whole file. I do want it to be viewed however withe automatic "guest" login. I have tried adding viewdocument & viewonline in the access contgrol for the guest user: this changes...
-
advanced access : - I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for normal user - A guest user cannot see a view of the document I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded. I do want it to be viewed however. I have tried adding viewdocument & viewonline in the access contgrol for the guest user: this changes nothing
-
moved to new thread
-
advanced access : I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for normal user A guest user cannot see a view of the document I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded. I do want it to be viewed however. I have tried adding viewdocument & viewonline in the access contgrol for the guest user: this changes nothing
-
advanced access : I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for normal user A guest user cannot see a view of the document I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded. I do want it to be viewed however.
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [69c84c] on Code
check if session exists
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [17ca27] on Code
add phrase 'filesize'
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [79560a] on Code
Merge branch 'seeddms-5.1.x' into seeddms-6.0.x
-
Uwe Steinmann committed [809734] on Code
add changes of 5.1.36
-
advanced access : I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for guest user I use a document of more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded. It seems to me that this download for guest was demanded before, it seems of a basic logic to have it as a yes/no option in advanced access .. please?
-
advanced access : I have no option to disable "download" functionallity for guest user I have a document pf more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded. It seems to me that this download for guest was demanded before, it seems of a basic logic to have it as a yes/no option in advanced access .. please?
-
advanced access : I have do no see the option to disable "download" functionallity for guest user I have a document pf more than 400 pages which is a "teaser" for guests to register as user. They are not going to copy this doc page by page but I do not want it to be downloaded. It seems to me that this download for guest was demanded before, it seems of a basic logic to have it as a yes/no option in advanced access .. please?
-
advanced access : I have do no see the option to disable "download" functionallity for guest user
-
great!
-
I have do no see the option to disable "download" functionallity for guest user
-
v 6,0,28 I am blocked at activating full text search in configuration. Will not accept click. mouse issue; solved.
-
v 6,0,28 I am blocked at activating full text search in configuration. Will not accept click.
-
I am blocked at activating full text search in configuration. Will not accept click.
-
Know error. It will be fixed in 6.0.29
-
V 6,0.28 all installation is functional. just an issue adding document: the adddocument let's me select a file bout does not 'echo' it's name in the field of the screen once selected. Uploading works however...
-
V 6,0.28 all installation is functional. just an issue adding document: the adddocument let's me select a file bout does not 'echo' it's name in the field of the screen once chose. Uploading works however...
-
all installation is functional. just an issue adding document: the adddocument let's me select a file bout does not 'echo' it's name in the field of the screen once chose. Uploading works however...
-
It might be possible, but that may of course not completely disable the current behaviour. Hence it must be configurable. If you find a way to collapse the tree, I will take care of the rest.
-
MerCury posted a comment on ticket #562
Ps - using SeedDMS 6.0.28 with PHP 8.1.30
-
Collapse unselected nodes in SeedDMS menu
-
In that case, the users will only see documents and folders beneath the home folder.
-
yes.. set the 'Use home folder as root folder' ?
-
Did you also set 'Use home folder as root folder' ?
-
If we set "Home Folder" to a user, when that user login, they can only view their "Home Folder" only. Is there is a way, a user can view multiple folder or a so called "Public Folder"? Tq
-
Andreas posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Hi Uwe, thank you very much for your offer. On weekend i got out that most of the time comes from my reverseproxy. If im thinking about the timings then from 10 seconds waiting about 2 seconds is from application-server and the rest about 8 from proxy itself. Next 2 weeks im on holidays and cannot evaluate more. But i improved it by adding a headerline so second time it gets it from local browsercache. This is possible because im using my dms only for archiving documents which are never changing...
-
If the conversion works, it should place the preview image in the cache/png/<docid>/and take it from there the next time. If you like contact me at info@seeddms.org and I can you with some extensions which helps debugging this.
-
i changed now to convert -density 100 -resize %wx '%f[0]' 'png:%o' and its a little bit faster (screenshot) each about 1-3s On commandline i tested one manually: root@6c28f20105ad:/var/www/seeddms/data/1048576/1357# time convert -density 100 -resize 10% 1.pdf 'png:bla.png' real 0m1.776s user 0m1.006s sys 0m0.263s but shouldnt it use if im doing things a second time the pregenerated png from cache, which should be much faster?
-
5 to 13 secs are too long. How long does it take to run the gs command on the command line? You could try some of the other commands in doc/README.Converters.md
-
Hi all, i have situation, that if im opening a folder in seeddms which is containing some documents (pdf) mostly with one page this is very slow to see them as preview-picture (see attached screenshot in file). But also if im waiting until all appeared and then going to another folder and coming back to the original then the slow times reappearing. Then i watched the logfiles and have seen no problems. I also watched into the cache folder and there are Cached files in there like that ./png/1224:...
-
Subject (cannot set any more): 6.0.28 slow Preview of Document Folders
-
Hi all, i have situation, that if im opening a folder in seeddms which is containing some documents (pdf) mostly with one page this is very slow to see them as preview-picture (see attached screenshot in file). But also if im waiting until all appeared and then going to another folder and coming back to the original then the slow times reappearing. Then i watched the logfiles and have seen no problems. I also watched into the cache folder and there are Cached files in there like that ./png/1224:...
-
The general problem is, that seeddms after a reverse proxy does not know the external url. This could be fixed by passing the http headers HTTP_X_FORWARDED_HOST and HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTO. But of course, it requires seeddms to evaluate those header fields. Currently, this is done in some cases, but not within the paperless extension. There is second option, if HTTP_X_FORWARDED_HOST and HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTO cannot be passed to seeddms. You can set the Base URL in the settings. But, this also doesn't...
-
'New documents' are all documents which has been added within the configured number of days, regardless of its status and if they were updated.
-
Roslina posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Hi Uwe, In my case, the document has already been released, but it's still showing in the 'New Documents' column. Shouldn't it be listed only under the 'Updated Documents' column? Does 'New Documents' refer to documents that are brand new, without any reviews or approvals yet? Or am I misunderstanding? Thank you.
-
Hi Uwe, thanks for your investigation. What i can tell you from my yesterday experiments is, that from all my "proxy_set_header" i posted yesterday line "proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host; " made that the internal hostname/port was successfully masked with the external. But the protocol was still http, which is only internal used and external not available. I tried to fix that by proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https; proxy_set_header X-Scheme $scheme; But this had no effect on my experiments....
-
Hi Uwe, thanks for your investigation. What i can tell you from my yesterday experiments is, that from all my "proxy_set_header" i posted yesterday line "proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host; " made that the internal hostname/port was successfully masked with the external. But the protocol was still http, which is only internal used and external not available. I tried to fix that by ~~~ proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https; proxy_set_header X-Scheme $scheme; But this had no effect on my experiments....
-
Hi Uwe, thanks for your investigation. What i can tell you from my yesterday experiments is, that from all my "proxy_set_header" i posted yesterday line "proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host; " made that the internal hostname/port was successfully masked with the external. But the protocol was still http, which is only internal used and external not available. I tried to fix that by ~~~ proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https; proxy_set_header X-Scheme $scheme; But this had no effect on my experiments....
-
Hi Uwe, thanks for your investigation. What i can tell you from my yesterday experiments is, that from all my "proxy_set_header" i posted yesterday line "proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host; " made that the internal hostname/port was successfully masked with the external. But the protocol was still http, which is only internal used and external not available. I tried to fix that by ~~~ proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https; proxy_set_header X-Scheme $scheme; But this had no effect on my experiments....
-
For somebody checking the new documents it may not be relevant if a document was also updated.
-
Hi Uwe, I configured 100 days. If the document has been updated, should it only appear in the 'Updated Documents' column and not in 'New Documents'? Please advise.
-
How many days did you configure in 'Days in past on dashboard' ?
-
Dear Experts, I am still new to this system and would like to learn more about the Dashboard for each user. I am using traditional workflow. The Dashboard has three columns: New Documents, Updated Documents, and Status Change. Could you please clarify why my updated/released document is still appearing in the 'New Documents' column? Additionally, where can I check this in the code? Kindly refer screenshot as attached. I would appreciate your assistance with this matter. Thank you.
-
The hostname problem is probably because SeedDMS just sees an access from your proxy and $request->getUri()->getBasePath() returns the uri of your proxy. This was already a problem with webdav and SeedDMS has code to evaluate HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR first. But this code isn't used here. I'll try to fix that. Thanks for reporting the problem.
-
Some of the accesses on the api look suspicious, e.g. a POST on 'api/token/%C2%A0-H'. Some are even missing the 'api/' part at the beginning. Authentication seems to working sometimes, but I can't tell if that was issued by the app or the test script. Could it be, that the HTTP header HTTP_AUTHORIZATION doesn't get through? If not, the token which was returned after successful login will not reach SeedDMS in subsequent calls.
1 >