From: Frank B. <fbergman@u.washington.edu> - 2010-03-03 20:54:00
|
Hello all, As you know I have been working on supporting SED-ML since the beginning. In the meantime three libraries are available: - LibSedML: a library for reading and writing SED-ML - LibSedMLRunner: a library running SED-ML files (currently using RoadRunner) - LibSedMLScript: a library that turns a human readable script into SED-ML. More information here: http://libsedml.sf.net/ http://frank-fbergmann.blogspot.com/2010/03/supporting-sed-ml.html best Frank |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2010-03-04 02:52:01
|
Hi Frank, This is good news, great work! As someone that knows next to nothing about .NET and C#, any suggestions on how I could go about utilizing LibSedML in a C++ application? From a quick look around, its looks like embedding mono (http://mono-project.com/Embedding_Mono) might be the way to go... I'm assuming here that linking against LibSedML might be easier than trying to use Richard's Java SED-ML library? I ask since the best way to use the CellML API implementation is from C++, at least for me :) Cheers, Andre. On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Frank Bergmann <fbergman@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Hello all, > > As you know I have been working on supporting SED-ML since the beginning. In > the meantime three libraries are available: > > - LibSedML: a library for reading and writing SED-ML > - LibSedMLRunner: a library running SED-ML files (currently using > RoadRunner) > - LibSedMLScript: a library that turns a human readable script into SED-ML. > > More information here: > > http://libsedml.sf.net/ > http://frank-fbergmann.blogspot.com/2010/03/supporting-sed-ml.html > > best > Frank > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > |
From: Frank B. <fbergman@u.washington.edu> - 2010-03-04 03:12:08
|
I used .NET of course because the language is still changing. WIth .NET I'm able to change the libraries and test them in projects across operating systems quickly. You are perfectly correct, Mono Embedding would probably be the way to go, I just tried it recently with RoadRunner and found no problems at all: http://frank-fbergmann.blogspot.com/2010/02/roadrunner-ccli-vs-embedding-mono.html Cheers Frank On Mar 3, 2010, at 6:51 PM, David Nickerson wrote: > Hi Frank, > > This is good news, great work! As someone that knows next to nothing > about .NET and C#, any suggestions on how I could go about utilizing > LibSedML in a C++ application? From a quick look around, its looks > like embedding mono (http://mono-project.com/Embedding_Mono) might be > the way to go... I'm assuming here that linking against LibSedML might > be easier than trying to use Richard's Java SED-ML library? > > I ask since the best way to use the CellML API implementation is from > C++, at least for me :) > > > Cheers, > Andre. > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Frank Bergmann > <fbergman@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> As you know I have been working on supporting SED-ML since the beginning. In >> the meantime three libraries are available: >> >> - LibSedML: a library for reading and writing SED-ML >> - LibSedMLRunner: a library running SED-ML files (currently using >> RoadRunner) >> - LibSedMLScript: a library that turns a human readable script into SED-ML. >> >> More information here: >> >> http://libsedml.sf.net/ >> http://frank-fbergmann.blogspot.com/2010/03/supporting-sed-ml.html >> >> best >> Frank >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2010-03-04 04:19:06
|
thanks, good to know I wasn't running off in the wrong direction! On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Frank Bergmann <fbergman@u.washington.edu> wrote: > I used .NET of course because the language is still changing. WIth .NET I'm able to change the libraries and test them in projects across operating systems quickly. You are perfectly correct, Mono Embedding would probably be the way to go, I just tried it recently with RoadRunner and found no problems at all: > > http://frank-fbergmann.blogspot.com/2010/02/roadrunner-ccli-vs-embedding-mono.html > > Cheers > Frank > |