This list is closed, nobody may subscribe to it.
2008 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(41) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(1) |
2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(8) |
2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(16) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
2014 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(16) |
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(8) |
2015 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(39) |
2016 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Chris M. <my...@ec...> - 2017-06-27 20:24:24
|
I think as long as the libraries are updated and a backwards compatible API function call exists, then it should not break software. So, I would say the libraries should hide this alias from the user. I’m fine though to make the specification say “numberOfSteps” for the new version. Chris > On Jun 27, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Herbert Sauro <uw....@gm...> wrote: > > Given that the sedml community is still very small, it would be better to get it right at this early stage, hence I prefer option > > 2) change the name to set thing else, e.g. numberOfSteps > > For those clinging to earlier versions they can check the version of the sedml and interpret numberofpoints in the old way. In that sense I don't think it affects backward compatibility. > > Herbett > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:08 PM Kyle Medley <me...@co... <mailto:me...@co...>> wrote: > It seems to me that breaking backwards compatibility defeats one of the major advantages of having a standard encoding, so I would prefer option 1. If people are not happy with that, I have a different suggestion: > > 4) Allow 'numberOfPoints', and do not change its meaning, but also create a new attribute 'numberOfSteps' with the same semantics. 'numberOfPoints' would not be deprecated. > > Cheers, > > Kyle > > J Kyle Medley, PhD Candidate > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > skype: jkylemedley > On 6/27/17 12:46 PM, Lucian Smith wrote: >> At HARMONY, the issue was brought up that the 'numberOfPoints' attribute is confusing, because the literal number of expected points in the output file is one more than that: the initial conditions, and the number of *computed* points. >> >> It was proposed that we fix this for SED-ML Level 1 Version 3. There are a few options: >> >> 1) No change: simply make it more clear in the spec that 'numberOfPoints' means 'number of computed points' aka 'number of steps'. >> >> 2) Change the name of the attribute to 'numberOfSteps' or possibly 'numberOfComputedPoints'. >> >> 3) Deprecate but allow 'numberOfPoints', and make a new 'numberOfSteps' attribute that people are encouraged to use instead. >> >> Any opinions? It seems like the advantage is preventing future confusion, and the cost is having a non-backwards-compatible spec, and the cost of implementation changes for the groups that currently support SED-ML. >> >> -Lucian >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot <http://sdm.link/slashdot> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... <mailto:SED...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot <http://sdm.link/slashdot>_______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... <mailto:SED...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ <http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________> > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... <mailto:SED...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss> |
From: Herbert S. <uw....@gm...> - 2017-06-27 20:20:51
|
Given that the sedml community is still very small, it would be better to get it right at this early stage, hence I prefer option 2) change the name to set thing else, e.g. numberOfSteps For those clinging to earlier versions they can check the version of the sedml and interpret numberofpoints in the old way. In that sense I don't think it affects backward compatibility. Herbett On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:08 PM Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > It seems to me that breaking backwards compatibility defeats one of the > major advantages of having a standard encoding, so I would prefer option 1. > If people are not happy with that, I have a different suggestion: > > 4) Allow 'numberOfPoints', and do not change its meaning, but also create > a new attribute 'numberOfSteps' with the same semantics. 'numberOfPoints' > would not be deprecated. > > Cheers, > > Kyle > > J Kyle Medley, PhD Candidate > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > skype: jkylemedley > > On 6/27/17 12:46 PM, Lucian Smith wrote: > > At HARMONY, the issue was brought up that the 'numberOfPoints' attribute > is confusing, because the literal number of expected points in the output > file is one more than that: the initial conditions, and the number of > *computed* points. > > It was proposed that we fix this for SED-ML Level 1 Version 3. There are > a few options: > > 1) No change: simply make it more clear in the spec that 'numberOfPoints' > means 'number of computed points' aka 'number of steps'. > > 2) Change the name of the attribute to 'numberOfSteps' or possibly > 'numberOfComputedPoints'. > > 3) Deprecate but allow 'numberOfPoints', and make a new 'numberOfSteps' > attribute that people are encouraged to use instead. > > Any opinions? It seems like the advantage is preventing future confusion, > and the cost is having a non-backwards-compatible spec, and the cost of > implementation changes for the groups that currently support SED-ML. > > -Lucian > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-06-27 20:08:38
|
It seems to me that breaking backwards compatibility defeats one of the major advantages of having a standard encoding, so I would prefer option 1. If people are not happy with that, I have a different suggestion: 4) Allow 'numberOfPoints', and do not change its meaning, but also create a new attribute 'numberOfSteps' with the same semantics. 'numberOfPoints' would not be deprecated. Cheers, Kyle J Kyle Medley, PhD Candidate Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle skype: jkylemedley On 6/27/17 12:46 PM, Lucian Smith wrote: > At HARMONY, the issue was brought up that the 'numberOfPoints' > attribute is confusing, because the literal number of expected points > in the output file is one more than that: the initial conditions, and > the number of *computed* points. > > It was proposed that we fix this for SED-ML Level 1 Version 3. There > are a few options: > > 1) No change: simply make it more clear in the spec that > 'numberOfPoints' means 'number of computed points' aka 'number of steps'. > > 2) Change the name of the attribute to 'numberOfSteps' or possibly > 'numberOfComputedPoints'. > > 3) Deprecate but allow 'numberOfPoints', and make a new > 'numberOfSteps' attribute that people are encouraged to use instead. > > Any opinions? It seems like the advantage is preventing future > confusion, and the cost is having a non-backwards-compatible spec, and > the cost of implementation changes for the groups that currently > support SED-ML. > > -Lucian > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |
From: Lucian S. <luc...@gm...> - 2017-06-27 19:46:53
|
At HARMONY, the issue was brought up that the 'numberOfPoints' attribute is confusing, because the literal number of expected points in the output file is one more than that: the initial conditions, and the number of *computed* points. It was proposed that we fix this for SED-ML Level 1 Version 3. There are a few options: 1) No change: simply make it more clear in the spec that 'numberOfPoints' means 'number of computed points' aka 'number of steps'. 2) Change the name of the attribute to 'numberOfSteps' or possibly 'numberOfComputedPoints'. 3) Deprecate but allow 'numberOfPoints', and make a new 'numberOfSteps' attribute that people are encouraged to use instead. Any opinions? It seems like the advantage is preventing future confusion, and the cost is having a non-backwards-compatible spec, and the cost of implementation changes for the groups that currently support SED-ML. -Lucian |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-06-27 15:22:17
|
Hi all, As with previous meetings, we will try to keep track of SED-ML related discussions using a google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l2jx5K6msZhB-kfZKjeN2WgRVgfkVuCYnM8yYhIsUsw/edit?usp=sharing. Please feel free to add, comment, correct as we go! We are currently not planning on broadcasting the sessions, but if you would like to join in please let us know and I'm sure we can work something out. The first SED-ML session starts here in Seattle in about 40 minutes. Full schedule available here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cXuTGNOpd9--fAaHXND9BoFY7H47YvaV2-xCktCDYKQ/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, David. |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-06-23 04:00:09
|
Hi all, Final reminder, voting closes *today* for the election of two new SED-ML editors. Vote here: https://goo.gl/forms/VzDYBvkfWUkh0Cjr1 Cheers, David. On 20 June 2017 at 10:42, David Nickerson <dav...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a reminder that voting closes this Friday for the election of two > new SED-ML editors. > > Vote here: https://goo.gl/forms/VzDYBvkfWUkh0Cjr1 > > Cheers, > David. > > > On 9 June 2017 at 18:45, David Nickerson <dav...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is a call for votes for electing two new SED-ML Editors to >> replace Ion Moraru and Sven Sahle, whose current terms have ended. >> Every member of the SED-ML forum (as determined by membership of the >> sed...@li... mailing list) is entitled to vote. >> >> Please vote for up to two candidates using the voting form at: >> https://goo.gl/forms/VzDYBvkfWUkh0Cjr1 >> >> Voting will end on June 23, 2017. >> >> Thank you in advance for your participation in this important process! >> >> >> Cheers, >> David. -- David Nickerson about.me/david.nickerson |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-06-19 22:43:05
|
Hi all, Just a reminder that voting closes this Friday for the election of two new SED-ML editors. Vote here: https://goo.gl/forms/VzDYBvkfWUkh0Cjr1 Cheers, David. On 9 June 2017 at 18:45, David Nickerson <dav...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for votes for electing two new SED-ML Editors to > replace Ion Moraru and Sven Sahle, whose current terms have ended. > Every member of the SED-ML forum (as determined by membership of the > sed...@li... mailing list) is entitled to vote. > > Please vote for up to two candidates using the voting form at: > https://goo.gl/forms/VzDYBvkfWUkh0Cjr1 > > Voting will end on June 23, 2017. > > Thank you in advance for your participation in this important process! > > > Cheers, > David. |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-06-13 23:21:38
|
COMBINE 2017: 8th Computational Modeling in Biology Network Workshop ========================================================== Oct. 9th - 13th, 2017, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, ITALY http://co.mbine.org/events/COMBINE_2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The "Computational Modeling in Biology" Network (COMBINE) is an initiative to coordinate the development of the various community standards and formats in systems biology and related fields. COMBINE 2017 will be a workshop-style event with oral presentations, posters, and breakout sessions. The five meeting days will include talks about the COMBINE standards and associated or related standardization efforts, as well as presentations of tools using these standards. Oral presentations will be selected from the submitted abstracts. In addition, poster sessions will allow people to inform each other about their software and other projects in a setting that fosters interaction and in-depth discussion. CONFIRMED SPEAKERS ------------------ Shailesh Appukuttan, UNIC, CNRS, France James Faeder, University of Pittsburgh, USA Martin Golebiewsk, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Germany. Nicolas La Novere, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK. Carlos F. Lopez, Department of Cancer Biology Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, USA Marco Nobile, DISCo, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Italy CALL FOR ABSTRACTS ------------------ We solicit high-quality abstracts, to be refereed by the COMBINE Coordinators below, for either oral or poster presentation at the Workshop. Abstracts will appear on the COMBINE website only, there will be no formal publication. Please see the COMBINE website for submission instructions. The submission process is hosted by Easychair. TOPICS OF INTEREST ------------------ Topics include, but are not limited to: - Data exchange, pipelines and model standards for systems biology - Graphical notation standards for systems biology - Standards for sharing and analysing biological pathway data - Standards for computational biological models More on the COMBINE standards at http://co.mbine.org/standards IMPORTANT DATES --------------- Abstract submission: July 1, 2017 Notification: July 23, 2017 COMBINE Workshop: October 9-13 2017 REGISTRATION ------------ Registrations are now open. The registration fee is set to 270 EUR and it includes breaks and the social event. We apologize for the cumbersome procedure; please read carefully the instructions for payment on the registration form. You can register at https://goo.gl/forms/omoiLmBda4rElye33 LOCAL CHAIRS ------------ Marco Antoniotti, Alex Graudenzi, Giancarlo Mauri, DISCo), (Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca) If you have any questions, please contact <marco.antoniotti [.at.] unimib.it> COMBINE COORDINATORS -------------------- Gary Bader (Toronto) Padraig Gleeson (UCL) Martin Golebiewski (Heidelberg) Michael Hucka (Caltech) Nicolas Le Novère (Babraham) Chris J. Myers (Utah) David Nickerson (Auckland) Falk Schreiber (Monash) Dagmar Waltemath (Rostock) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ---------------- COMBINE 2017 is generously supported by: - Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication (DISCo), Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca (ITALY) - Centre of Systems Biology, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca (ITALY) |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-06-09 06:45:32
|
Hi all, This is a call for votes for electing two new SED-ML Editors to replace Ion Moraru and Sven Sahle, whose current terms have ended. Every member of the SED-ML forum (as determined by membership of the sed...@li... mailing list) is entitled to vote. Please vote for up to two candidates using the voting form at: https://goo.gl/forms/VzDYBvkfWUkh0Cjr1 Voting will end on June 23, 2017. Thank you in advance for your participation in this important process! Cheers, David. |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-06-07 04:53:36
|
Thanks David! J Kyle Medley, PhD Student Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle skype: jkylemedley On 6/6/17 7:24 PM, David Nickerson wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > I use the C++ libSEDML and you can see a couple of maybe useful > examples of using custom annotations here > https://github.com/nickerso/get-simulator/blob/OutputTypes/src/sedml.cpp#L606 > and https://github.com/nickerso/get-simulator/blob/OutputTypes/src/sedml.cpp#L1131. > > Cheers, > David. > > > On 7 June 2017 at 13:23, Chris Myers <my...@ec...> wrote: >> I’m using jlibSEDML. Some of the code is here: >> >> https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/analysis/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/analysis/util/SEDMLutilities.java >> >> and more here: >> >> https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/gui/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/gui/analysisView/AnalysisView.java >> >> Chris >> >> On Jun 6, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: >> >> Thanks for your help Chris! Out of curiosity, are you using libSEDML (C++ or >> C#?) or are you writing the XML yourself? I was just curious because it >> would be helpful to have an example of how to work with custom annotations >> in libSEDML. >> >> J Kyle Medley, PhD Student >> Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab >> University of Washington, Seattle >> skype: jkylemedley >> >> On 06/06/2017 04:14 PM, Chris Myers wrote: >> >> I believe that we agreed at COMBINE that using repeated task for this was >> overkill. Instead, you should be able to specify the number of runs, then >> be able to select in your graph which run or statistic to plot. We use this >> KISAO term: >> >> http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomodels.net%2Fkisao%2FKISAO%23KISAO_0000326 >> >> to specify number of runs for a stochastic simulation. We have currently >> added a custom annotation to the dataGenerator to indicate which data set to >> generate data from. For example, this can be a run number or a statistic >> like mean, using custom annotation for now. See attached example. >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I was just wondering if it is possible to compute the mean and standard >> deviations of stochastic simulations in SED-ML. Frank has a great demo of >> running multiple stochastic traces, but I'm not sure how to extend it to >> allow computing the first two moments. My understanding is that a repeated >> task generates data with one more dimension than the input, so Frank's >> example is essentially flattening the data before plotting it. I'm not sure >> if it's possible to manipulate these higher dimensions in a dataGenerator or >> use some clever MathML to sum along one axis. Any ideas? >> >> Thanks, >> Kyle >> >> -- >> J Kyle Medley, PhD Student >> Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab >> University of Washington, Seattle >> skype: jkylemedley >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! >> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! >> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss >> > > |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-06-07 02:25:19
|
Thanks so much! J Kyle Medley, PhD Student Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle skype: jkylemedley On 06/06/2017 06:23 PM, Chris Myers wrote: > I’m using jlibSEDML. Some of the code is here: > > https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/analysis/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/analysis/util/SEDMLutilities.java > > and more here: > > https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/gui/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/gui/analysisView/AnalysisView.java > > Chris > >> On Jun 6, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co... >> <mailto:me...@co...>> wrote: >> >> Thanks for your help Chris! Out of curiosity, are you using libSEDML >> (C++ or C#?) or are you writing the XML yourself? I was just curious >> because it would be helpful to have an example of how to work with >> custom annotations in libSEDML. >> J Kyle Medley, PhD Student >> Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab >> University of Washington, Seattle >> skype: jkylemedley >> On 06/06/2017 04:14 PM, Chris Myers wrote: >>> I believe that we agreed at COMBINE that using repeated task for >>> this was overkill. Instead, you should be able to specify the >>> number of runs, then be able to select in your graph which run or >>> statistic to plot. We use this KISAO term: >>> >>> http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomodels.net%2Fkisao%2FKISAO%23KISAO_0000326 >>> <http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http://www.biomodels.net/kisao/KISAO#KISAO_0000326> >>> >>> to specify number of runs for a stochastic simulation. We have >>> currently added a custom annotation to the dataGenerator to indicate >>> which data set to generate data from. For example, this can be a >>> run number or a statistic like mean, using custom annotation for >>> now. See attached example. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I was just wondering if it is possible to compute the mean and >>>> standard deviations of stochastic simulations in SED-ML. Frank has >>>> a great demo >>>> <http://sysbioapps.dyndns.org/SED-ML_Web_Tools/Home/SimulateUrl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.code.sf.net%2Fp%2Flibsedml%2Fcode%2Ftrunk%2FSamples%2Fsedx-archives%2Fnestedv3%2Fv3-example3-repeated-stochastic-runs.sedx> >>>> of running multiple stochastic traces, but I'm not sure how to >>>> extend it to allow computing the first two moments. My >>>> understanding is that a repeated task generates data with one more >>>> dimension than the input, so Frank's example is essentially >>>> flattening the data before plotting it. I'm not sure if it's >>>> possible to manipulate these higher dimensions in a dataGenerator >>>> or use some clever MathML to sum along one axis. Any ideas? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Kyle >>>> -- >>>> J Kyle Medley, PhD Student >>>> Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab >>>> University of Washington, Seattle >>>> skype: jkylemedley >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! >>>> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ >>>> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >>>> SED...@li... >>>> <mailto:SED...@li...> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>> engaging tech sites,Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org>!http://sdm.link/slashdot >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >>> SED...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org>! >> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... >> <mailto:SED...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-06-07 02:24:35
|
Hi Kyle, I use the C++ libSEDML and you can see a couple of maybe useful examples of using custom annotations here https://github.com/nickerso/get-simulator/blob/OutputTypes/src/sedml.cpp#L606 and https://github.com/nickerso/get-simulator/blob/OutputTypes/src/sedml.cpp#L1131. Cheers, David. On 7 June 2017 at 13:23, Chris Myers <my...@ec...> wrote: > I’m using jlibSEDML. Some of the code is here: > > https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/analysis/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/analysis/util/SEDMLutilities.java > > and more here: > > https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/gui/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/gui/analysisView/AnalysisView.java > > Chris > > On Jun 6, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > > Thanks for your help Chris! Out of curiosity, are you using libSEDML (C++ or > C#?) or are you writing the XML yourself? I was just curious because it > would be helpful to have an example of how to work with custom annotations > in libSEDML. > > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > skype: jkylemedley > > On 06/06/2017 04:14 PM, Chris Myers wrote: > > I believe that we agreed at COMBINE that using repeated task for this was > overkill. Instead, you should be able to specify the number of runs, then > be able to select in your graph which run or statistic to plot. We use this > KISAO term: > > http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomodels.net%2Fkisao%2FKISAO%23KISAO_0000326 > > to specify number of runs for a stochastic simulation. We have currently > added a custom annotation to the dataGenerator to indicate which data set to > generate data from. For example, this can be a run number or a statistic > like mean, using custom annotation for now. See attached example. > > Chris > > > > > On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was just wondering if it is possible to compute the mean and standard > deviations of stochastic simulations in SED-ML. Frank has a great demo of > running multiple stochastic traces, but I'm not sure how to extend it to > allow computing the first two moments. My understanding is that a repeated > task generates data with one more dimension than the input, so Frank's > example is essentially flattening the data before plotting it. I'm not sure > if it's possible to manipulate these higher dimensions in a dataGenerator or > use some clever MathML to sum along one axis. Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Kyle > > -- > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > skype: jkylemedley > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! > http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! > http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > -- David Nickerson about.me/david.nickerson |
From: Chris M. <my...@ec...> - 2017-06-07 01:24:14
|
I’m using jlibSEDML. Some of the code is here: https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/analysis/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/analysis/util/SEDMLutilities.java <https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/analysis/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/analysis/util/SEDMLutilities.java> and more here: https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/gui/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/gui/analysisView/AnalysisView.java <https://github.com/MyersResearchGroup/iBioSim/blob/master/gui/src/main/java/edu/utah/ece/async/ibiosim/gui/analysisView/AnalysisView.java> Chris > On Jun 6, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > > Thanks for your help Chris! Out of curiosity, are you using libSEDML (C++ or C#?) or are you writing the XML yourself? I was just curious because it would be helpful to have an example of how to work with custom annotations in libSEDML. > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > skype: jkylemedley > On 06/06/2017 04:14 PM, Chris Myers wrote: >> I believe that we agreed at COMBINE that using repeated task for this was overkill. Instead, you should be able to specify the number of runs, then be able to select in your graph which run or statistic to plot. We use this KISAO term: >> >> http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomodels.net%2Fkisao%2FKISAO%23KISAO_0000326 <http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http://www.biomodels.net/kisao/KISAO#KISAO_0000326> >> >> to specify number of runs for a stochastic simulation. We have currently added a custom annotation to the dataGenerator to indicate which data set to generate data from. For example, this can be a run number or a statistic like mean, using custom annotation for now. See attached example. >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> >>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Kyle Medley < <mailto:me...@co...>me...@co... <mailto:me...@co...>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I was just wondering if it is possible to compute the mean and standard deviations of stochastic simulations in SED-ML. Frank has a great demo <http://sysbioapps.dyndns.org/SED-ML_Web_Tools/Home/SimulateUrl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.code.sf.net%2Fp%2Flibsedml%2Fcode%2Ftrunk%2FSamples%2Fsedx-archives%2Fnestedv3%2Fv3-example3-repeated-stochastic-runs.sedx> of running multiple stochastic traces, but I'm not sure how to extend it to allow computing the first two moments. My understanding is that a repeated task generates data with one more dimension than the input, so Frank's example is essentially flattening the data before plotting it. I'm not sure if it's possible to manipulate these higher dimensions in a dataGenerator or use some clever MathML to sum along one axis. Any ideas? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kyle >>> -- >>> J Kyle Medley, PhD Student >>> Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab >>> University of Washington, Seattle >>> skype: jkylemedley >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! <http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________>http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ <http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________> >>> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >>> SED...@li... <mailto:SED...@li...> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot <http://sdm.link/slashdot> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... <mailto:SED...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-06-07 00:26:40
|
Thanks for your help Chris! Out of curiosity, are you using libSEDML (C++ or C#?) or are you writing the XML yourself? I was just curious because it would be helpful to have an example of how to work with custom annotations in libSEDML. J Kyle Medley, PhD Student Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle skype: jkylemedley On 06/06/2017 04:14 PM, Chris Myers wrote: > I believe that we agreed at COMBINE that using repeated task for this > was overkill. Instead, you should be able to specify the number of > runs, then be able to select in your graph which run or statistic to > plot. We use this KISAO term: > > http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomodels.net%2Fkisao%2FKISAO%23KISAO_0000326 > <http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http://www.biomodels.net/kisao/KISAO#KISAO_0000326> > > to specify number of runs for a stochastic simulation. We have > currently added a custom annotation to the dataGenerator to indicate > which data set to generate data from. For example, this can be a run > number or a statistic like mean, using custom annotation for now. See > attached example. > > Chris > > > > >> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co... >> <mailto:me...@co...>> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I was just wondering if it is possible to compute the mean and >> standard deviations of stochastic simulations in SED-ML. Frank has a >> great demo >> <http://sysbioapps.dyndns.org/SED-ML_Web_Tools/Home/SimulateUrl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.code.sf.net%2Fp%2Flibsedml%2Fcode%2Ftrunk%2FSamples%2Fsedx-archives%2Fnestedv3%2Fv3-example3-repeated-stochastic-runs.sedx> >> of running multiple stochastic traces, but I'm not sure how to extend >> it to allow computing the first two moments. My understanding is that >> a repeated task generates data with one more dimension than the >> input, so Frank's example is essentially flattening the data before >> plotting it. I'm not sure if it's possible to manipulate these higher >> dimensions in a dataGenerator or use some clever MathML to sum along >> one axis. Any ideas? >> >> Thanks, >> Kyle >> -- >> J Kyle Medley, PhD Student >> Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab >> University of Washington, Seattle >> skype: jkylemedley >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org>! >> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ >> SED-ML-discuss mailing list >> SED...@li... >> <mailto:SED...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |
From: Chris M. <my...@ec...> - 2017-06-06 23:14:29
|
I believe that we agreed at COMBINE that using repeated task for this was overkill. Instead, you should be able to specify the number of runs, then be able to select in your graph which run or statistic to plot. We use this KISAO term: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomodels.net%2Fkisao%2FKISAO%23KISAO_0000326 <http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/KISAO?p=classes&conceptid=http://www.biomodels.net/kisao/KISAO#KISAO_0000326> to specify number of runs for a stochastic simulation. We have currently added a custom annotation to the dataGenerator to indicate which data set to generate data from. For example, this can be a run number or a statistic like mean, using custom annotation for now. See attached example. Chris > On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was just wondering if it is possible to compute the mean and standard deviations of stochastic simulations in SED-ML. Frank has a great demo <http://sysbioapps.dyndns.org/SED-ML_Web_Tools/Home/SimulateUrl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.code.sf.net%2Fp%2Flibsedml%2Fcode%2Ftrunk%2FSamples%2Fsedx-archives%2Fnestedv3%2Fv3-example3-repeated-stochastic-runs.sedx> of running multiple stochastic traces, but I'm not sure how to extend it to allow computing the first two moments. My understanding is that a repeated task generates data with one more dimension than the input, so Frank's example is essentially flattening the data before plotting it. I'm not sure if it's possible to manipulate these higher dimensions in a dataGenerator or use some clever MathML to sum along one axis. Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Kyle > -- > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > skype: jkylemedley > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-06-06 20:06:53
|
Hi All, I was just wondering if it is possible to compute the mean and standard deviations of stochastic simulations in SED-ML. Frank has a great demo <http://sysbioapps.dyndns.org/SED-ML_Web_Tools/Home/SimulateUrl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.code.sf.net%2Fp%2Flibsedml%2Fcode%2Ftrunk%2FSamples%2Fsedx-archives%2Fnestedv3%2Fv3-example3-repeated-stochastic-runs.sedx> of running multiple stochastic traces, but I'm not sure how to extend it to allow computing the first two moments. My understanding is that a repeated task generates data with one more dimension than the input, so Frank's example is essentially flattening the data before plotting it. I'm not sure if it's possible to manipulate these higher dimensions in a dataGenerator or use some clever MathML to sum along one axis. Any ideas? Thanks, Kyle -- J Kyle Medley, PhD Student Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle skype: jkylemedley |
From: Lucian S. <luc...@gm...> - 2017-05-31 20:59:55
|
Nobody has worked on l1v3 at all, so whenever anyone works on it, whoever that might be will put in whatever they want ;-) (Presumably, they'll start with the discussion at COMBINE last year and go from there.) -Lucian On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > Thanks for your response David! Unfortunately I can't reply directly. I > don't seem to be subscribed to the list. I think I already sent a > subscription request but I sent another one just in case. Could someone > please add me to the list? Thanks! > > Also, just for clarification - are you saying this is slated for post-L1V3 > at this point? Or is there still a chance it could make it in? > > > > -- > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss > |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-05-31 20:55:11
|
Hi Kyle, The hope is that those minor tweaks discussed at HARMONY will make it into L1V3, but will require the spec changes to be proposed and discussed with the community. The L1V3 draft hasn't changed for a few years now waiting for a second implementation, so if tool developers implement "draft" versions of these features it would greatly help form the proposed updates to the current draft L1V3. Cheers, David. On 1 June 2017 at 08:48, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > Thanks for your response David! Unfortunately I can't reply directly. I > don't seem to be subscribed to the list. I think I already sent a > subscription request but I sent another one just in case. Could someone > please add me to the list? Thanks! > > Also, just for clarification - are you saying this is slated for post-L1V3 > at this point? Or is there still a chance it could make it in? > > > > -- > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss -- David Nickerson about.me/david.nickerson |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-05-31 20:54:29
|
Sorry, spoke too soon. I think I'm in. J Kyle Medley, PhD Student Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle On 5/31/17 1:48 PM, Kyle Medley wrote: > Thanks for your response David! Unfortunately I can't reply directly. > I don't seem to be subscribed to the list. I think I already sent a > subscription request but I sent another one just in case. Could > someone please add me to the list? Thanks! > > Also, just for clarification - are you saying this is slated for > post-L1V3 at this point? Or is there still a chance it could make it in? > > |
From: Herbert S. <uw....@gm...> - 2017-05-31 20:51:51
|
Ideally it should go in this year since it was decided last year. Herbert On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > Thanks for your response David! Unfortunately I can't reply directly. I > don't seem to be subscribed to the list. I think I already sent a > subscription request but I sent another one just in case. Could someone > please add me to the list? Thanks! > > Also, just for clarification - are you saying this is slated for post-L1V3 > at this point? Or is there still a chance it could make it in? > > > > -- > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-05-31 20:48:38
|
Thanks for your response David! Unfortunately I can't reply directly. I don't seem to be subscribed to the list. I think I already sent a subscription request but I sent another one just in case. Could someone please add me to the list? Thanks! Also, just for clarification - are you saying this is slated for post-L1V3 at this point? Or is there still a chance it could make it in? -- J Kyle Medley, PhD Student Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-05-31 05:29:41
|
Hi Kyle, This was something discussed at the COMBINE meeting last year. As you can see from the discussion document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uNNkjATFUQ78FspKkBTwJ2UmevmCGfovaKI22sr3VF8/edit?usp=sharing), it was hoped that a proposal to make this change to the L1V3 draft specification would quickly follow - but unfortunately this hasn't happened yet. Features like this are on the agenda to try and tidy up at HARMONY. Cheers, David. On 31 May 2017 at 17:18, Kyle Medley <me...@co...> wrote: > Hi All, > > I was just wondering if SED-ML supports axis labels for plot2D? I can't seem > to find any examples that use them. > > Thanks, > Kyle > > -- > J Kyle Medley, PhD Student > Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab > University of Washington, Seattle > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss -- David Nickerson about.me/david.nickerson |
From: Kyle M. <me...@co...> - 2017-05-31 05:18:19
|
Hi All, I was just wondering if SED-ML supports axis labels for plot2D? I can't seem to find any examples that use them. Thanks, Kyle -- J Kyle Medley, PhD Student Bioengineering/BPSD, Sauro Lab University of Washington, Seattle |
From: David N. <dav...@gm...> - 2017-05-30 11:57:31
|
Hi all, Just a reminder that you have until the 4th of June (this Sunday) to nominate candidates for the SED-ML editor election. Cheers, David. On 21 May 2017 at 09:08, David Nickerson <dav...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for nominations for two SED-ML editors to replace Sven > Sahle and Ion Moraru, whose terms ended on the 31st of December 2016. > > The length of a SED-ML Editor's term is 3 years, belatedly starting > from the 1st of January 2017. > > The current editors are Ion Moraru (to be replaced), Sven Sahle (to be > replaced), Brett Olivier (until 2017), David Nickerson (until 2017), > and Lucian Smith (until 2018). > > We would like to ask you to nominate suitable candidates. You may > nominate anyone (including yourself) who you think is qualified to act > as an editor. You can fill out this survey multiple times in order to > nominate multiple candidates. The current members of the editorial > board can not be nominated. > > The nomination page is at: https://goo.gl/forms/jh6GGU5grUG0Bnv42 > > The call for nomination is open from now until the 4th of June 2017. > After the nomination phase, we will issue a call for voting. > > Thanks, > David. -- David Nickerson about.me/david.nickerson |
From: Kiri C. <kir...@uw...> - 2017-05-26 18:54:25
|
Dear all, We were able to extend the deadline for booking at the University Inn <http://www.universityinnseattle.com/> with special group code to *June 2nd*. If you haven't booked hotels yet, please do so. More details are available at the Harmony website <http://co.mbine.org/events/HARMONY_2017#Accommodation>. *Also, if you have booked at a nearby Watertown Hotel instead of the University Inn, **please let me know. *Both places are operated by the same company, so we might be able to get some deals out for you. Thank you. On behalf of the HARMONY 2017 local organizers, Herbert Sauro Kyle Medley Kiri Choi |