Re: [SED-ML-discuss] SED-ML topics for HARMONY

[Herbert S. <uw....@gm...>]

I guess one thing is add the material agreed to last year into the
document. Also a discussion on the state of the libraries would be useful,
without those we cannot easily use sedml.

Herbert

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:59 PM David Nickerson <dav...@gm...>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> HARMONY is rapidly approaching in Seattle this June 26-30
> (http://co.mbine.org/events/HARMONY_2017). There is a preliminary
> draft agenda available via the website, with sessions rapidly filling
> up.
>
> Are there any specific topics that people would like to see discussed
> or worked on during HARMONY? There have been some offline discussions
> around clarifying some details in the specification, so we'll be
> aiming for at least one session on making sure the SED-ML L1V3 draft
> itself is a clear and unambiguous definition of SED-ML, but otherwise
> the focus for SED-ML will be trying to help get implementations of the
> L1V3 draft up and running so that we can start moving beyond.
>
> Cheers,
> David.
>
>
> --
>
>
> David Nickerson
> about.me/david.nickerson
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> SED-ML-discuss mailing list
> SED...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss
>