Re: [SED-ML-discuss] Question about model IDs

[Nicolas Le N. <le...@eb...>]

On 07/10/11 16:36, Richard Adams wrote:

>> No matter what, I'd prefer for the archive not to go away.
>
> No, I wasn't suggesting we bin the archive idea altogether, it's actually
> very convenient, and I've developed a fair bit of support for the proposed
> archive in software. I just meant that the archive may not be needed for
> exchange, if all necessary resources are available through a URL.

IMHO it does not matter. An archive could contain only a SED-ML file 
referring to everything through URIs. Or it could contain a SED-ML file 
that refers to a local data-set contained in the archive, and point to a 
model using a URI.

-- 
Nicolas LE NOVERE, Computational Systems Neurobiology, EMBL-EBI, WTGC,
Hinxton CB101SD UK, Mob:+447833147074, Tel:+441223494521 Fax:468,
Skype:n.lenovere, AIM:nlenovere, twitter:@lenovere
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov/, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/compneur/