[sed-ml-editors] [ sed-ml-SED-ML L1V1-3082434 ] Discrepancy between spec and schema on ListOf

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

SED-ML L1V1 item #3082434, was opened at 2010-10-06 21:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by otter606
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1345549&aid=3082434&group_id=293618

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Richard Adams (otter606)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Discrepancy between spec and schema on ListOf

Initial Comment:
Section 3.8 - "All listOf* elements are optional in a SED-ML document" 
but only ListofOutputs has minOccurs=0 - all other other top-level listofXXX lack a minOccurs - default is 1.
Is there any reason for ListOf to be optional? -it's much easier to have ListOf as it keeps structure of document consistent


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richard Adams (otter606)
Date: 2010-10-06 21:32

Message:
Also : ListOfVariables/PArameters : if can be empty then declarations in
schema need 'minOccurs=0". Some listOf descriptions in the spec lack a
statement of cardinality. Is it correct to allow the ListOfModels to  have
0 models? 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1345549&aid=3082434&group_id=293618