From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-10-06 20:16:47
|
SED-ML L1V1 item #3082434, was opened at 2010-10-06 21:16 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by otter606 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1345549&aid=3082434&group_id=293618 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Richard Adams (otter606) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Discrepancy between spec and schema on ListOf Initial Comment: Section 3.8 - "All listOf* elements are optional in a SED-ML document" but only ListofOutputs has minOccurs=0 - all other other top-level listofXXX lack a minOccurs - default is 1. Is there any reason for ListOf to be optional? -it's much easier to have ListOf as it keeps structure of document consistent ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1345549&aid=3082434&group_id=293618 |