From: Frank B. <fbergman@u.washington.edu> - 2010-06-17 18:00:08
|
> > I'm still missing the most important one ... the fix to the ChangeXML ... > > implementing adding of elements by having to replace an existing model > > element with itself and another one is just plain wrong! It would be great > > to have it separated out into: > > > > AddXML > > ChangeXML > > RemoveXML > > > > Or at least have an operation flag on the ChangeXML element! > > > > I was not sure if there was an agreement here for having an "operation" > attribute > defining the type of change as one of add, delete, replace? > Well .. there was an agreement, that this is needed. So far we have: - favoring attribute: Nicolas - slight preference for element: Richard, Frank (though I suppose if no one else can live with the elements then we would not loose much sleep in not getting them) - undecided: the rest Cheers Frank > Dagmar > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |